Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
TMFEvsQFLRETF Comparison
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF (TMFE) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. TMFE is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.89% for QFLR. TMFE is down -3.89% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. QFLR performs better with -0.67% YTD performance, and +$38M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TMFE and QFLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TMFE vs QFLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TMFE QFLR | -1.42%-0.62% | -4.13%-0.51% | -3.89%-0.67% | +10.06%+23.79% | +86.49%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | TMFE QFLR | -$4M+$2M | -$9M+$45M | -$6M+$38M | +$7M+$133M | +$46M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TMFE QFLR | +11.68%+11.79% | +17.49%+12.83% | +15.34%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | TMFE QFLR | -5.64%-3.34% | -11.79%-7.52% | -18.48%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | TMFE QFLR | 59d42d | 35d45d | 139dn/a | n/an/a |
TMFE | QFLR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.88 | $33.87 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.02 | $34.00 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
TMFE | QFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
TMFE | QFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.88 | $33.87 |
| 1D performance | -0.50% | -0.38% |
| AuM | $86.88 M | $468.86 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.89% |
TMFE | QFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Motley Fool Asset Management | Innovator |
| Benchmark | Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 94 | 40 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 31, 2021 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the TMFE and QFLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, TMFE is down -3.89% year-to-date (YTD), while QFLR has lost -0.67%. That puts QFLR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TMFE or QFLR?
Year-to-date, the TMFE ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to +$38M for QFLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: TMFE or QFLR?
Over the past year, TMFE had a volatility of 17.49%, while QFLR experienced 12.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: TMFE or QFLR?
As of March 12, 2026, TMFE holds $86.88 M in assets under management (AUM), while QFLR manages $468.86 M.
What sectors do the TMFE and QFLR ETFs invest in?
TMFE leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QFLR focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the TMFE ETF and QFLR ETF?
TMFE top holdings include COSTCO WHOLESALE, ALPHABET INC-CL and AMAZON.COM INC. QFLR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: TMFE or QFLR?
TMFE holds 100 securities with 63.29% of its assets in the top 15. QFLR has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.79%.
How Innovator's "Managed Floor" ETFs Can Fit Into a 40/30/30 Portfolio
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
