TCHPvsIWFETF Comparison
VS
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. TCHP's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, IWF's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. TCHP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.18% for IWF. TCHP is down -5.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$419M in YTD flows. IWF performs better with -0.61% YTD performance, and -$5.22B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TCHP and IWF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
TCHP vs IWF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TCHP IWF | -4.56%-5.54% | -5.80%-1.49% | -5.63%-0.61% | +1.19%+7.04% | +63.30%+67.47% | +42.51%+72.41% |
| Flows | TCHP IWF | -$7M-$1.48B | +$68M-$2.61B | +$419M-$5.22B | +$573M-$2.89B | +$1.27B-$1.71B | +$1.46B-$2.66B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TCHP IWF | +19.00%+20.22% | +17.99%+17.64% | +20.28%+19.74% | +24.06%+21.81% |
| Max drawdown | TCHP IWF | -11.21%-11.38% | -17.35%-16.23% | -22.89%-23.36% | -42.43%-32.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | TCHP IWF | 58d59d | 190d189d | 152d191d | 830d743d |
Trading data
TCHP | IWF | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.83 | $118.32 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $48.11 | $117.43 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TCHP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexTCHP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
TCHP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.83 | $118.32 |
| 1D performance | +1.50% | +0.76% |
| AuM | $2.03 B | $120.26 B |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
TCHP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | T. Rowe Price | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 64 | 366 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2020 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
TCHP
USA
94.06%
Other
5.94%
IWF
USA
99.13%
Other
0.87%
Sectors
TCHP
Technology
67.64%
Finance
7.04%
Other
25.33%
IWF
Technology
68.41%
Industrials
8.26%
Other
23.34%
Advertisement
Diversification
TCHP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.13%
IWF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
TCHP
NVIDIA Corp.
15.95%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.31%
Broadcom Inc.
5.96%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.85%
Apple, Inc.
4.54%
Microsoft Corp.
4.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.64%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.51%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.32%
Carvana Co.
3.24%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.62%
Tesla, Inc.
2.61%
Lam Research Corp.
2.51%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.50%
IWF
NVIDIA Corp.
13.83%
Apple, Inc.
6.72%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.17%
Broadcom Inc.
5.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.98%
Microsoft Corp.
4.11%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.86%
Tesla, Inc.
3.64%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.00%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.84%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.80%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.70%
Visa, Inc.
1.68%
Lam Research Corp.
1.60%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.43%
Frequently asked questions about TCHP and IWF
How have the TCHP and IWF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, TCHP is down -5.63% year-to-date (YTD), while IWF has lost -0.61%. That puts IWF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TCHP or IWF?
Year-to-date, the TCHP ETF saw +$419M in flows, compared to -$5.22B for IWF.
Which ETF is more volatile: TCHP or IWF?
Over the past year, TCHP had a volatility of 17.99%, while IWF experienced 17.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: TCHP or IWF?
As of July 29, 2026, TCHP holds $2.03 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWF manages $120.26 B.
What sectors do the TCHP and IWF ETFs invest in?
TCHP leans toward sectors like Technology and Finance. Meanwhile, IWF focuses on Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the TCHP ETF and IWF ETF?
TCHP top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. IWF holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TCHP or IWF?
TCHP holds 65 securities with 70.13% of its assets in the top 15. IWF has 369 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.56%.
Advertisement
Latest news about TCHP & IWF
Opinion: Don't Write Off Semi-Transparent Active ETFs Just Yet
October 5, 2023
TCHP
Top 3 growth ETFs of 2022
November 18, 2022
IWF
Advertisement
Advertisement
