TBJLvsJEPQETF Comparison
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF July
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF July (TBJL) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. TBJL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.35% for JEPQ. TBJL is down -5.62% year-to-date (YTD) with -$16M in YTD flows. JEPQ performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$10.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TBJL and JEPQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TBJL vs JEPQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TBJL JEPQ | -0.13%+0.51% | -2.08%+2.60% | -5.62%+10.72% | -8.12%+15.71% | +3.75%+71.07% | -22.18%n/a |
| Flows | TBJL JEPQ | -+$1.45B | -$2M+$3.86B | -$16M+$10.33B | -$19M+$11.72B | -$76M+$33.68B | +$5M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TBJL JEPQ | +6.86%+13.96% | +5.65%+14.95% | +8.62%+15.77% | +10.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown | TBJL JEPQ | -4.97%-5.97% | -10.94%-8.85% | -14.80%-20.17% | -29.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | TBJL JEPQ | 89d13d | 360d76d | 760d169d | 1776dn/a |
TBJL | JEPQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.78 | $58.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $18.76 | $60.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
TBJL | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.78 | $58.81 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | -2.15% |
| AuM | $8.47 M | $43.34 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.35% |
TBJL | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 18, 2020 | May 3, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
