Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPXDvsGVUSETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. SPXD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Staples. In contrast, GVUS's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. SPXD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.12% for GVUS. SPXD is up 2.04% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. GVUS performs better with 3.48% YTD performance, and -$18M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPXD and GVUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPXD vs GVUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPXD GVUS | -4.10%-3.22% | +1.15%+2.74% | +2.04%+3.48% | n/a+19.94% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SPXD GVUS | -- | +$0K-$18M | --$18M | --$52M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPXD GVUS | +10.38%+10.66% | n/a+15.61% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SPXD GVUS | -5.09%-3.51% | n/a-12.05% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SPXD GVUS | 12d10d | n/a52d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
SPXD | GVUS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.38 | $55.17 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.42 | $55.16 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPXD | GVUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPXD | GVUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.38 | $55.17 |
| 1D performance | -0.14% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $6.34 M | $401.16 M |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.12% |
SPXD | GVUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index | Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 479 | 786 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 23, 2025 | November 29, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPXD and GVUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SPXD is up 2.04% year-to-date (YTD), while GVUS has returned 3.48%. That puts GVUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPXD or GVUS?
Year-to-date, the SPXD ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$18M for GVUS.
Which ETF is bigger: SPXD or GVUS?
As of March 13, 2026, SPXD holds $6.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while GVUS manages $401.16 M.
What sectors do the SPXD and GVUS ETFs invest in?
SPXD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, GVUS focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SPXD ETF and GVUS ETF?
SPXD top holdings include BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, ABBOTT LABS and COSTCO WHOLESALE. GVUS holds in its top three: BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPXD or GVUS?
SPXD holds 503 securities with 19.84% of its assets in the top 15. GVUS has 848 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.92%.
How SPXD Delivers a More Balanced S&P 500 Exposure
The Newer, Smarter Way to Reduce S&P 500 Concentration Risk with ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
