SPHBvsQDFETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF (QDF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. SPHB's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, QDF's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. SPHB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.4% for QDF. SPHB is up 15.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$103M in YTD flows. QDF performs worse with 12.95% YTD performance, and -$87M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPHB and QDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SPHB vs QDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPHB QDF | -12.88%-0.70% | -5.84%-0.92% | +15.87%+12.95% | +17.81%+14.56% | +108.31%+70.63% | +74.54%+69.75% |
| Flows | SPHB QDF | -$67M-$7M | -$84M-$34M | +$103M-$87M | +$148M-$78M | +$22M-$233M | -$829M-$281M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPHB QDF | +30.09%+9.35% | +28.82%+11.91% | +27.05%+14.07% | +28.41%+15.76% |
| Max drawdown | SPHB QDF | -13.95%-3.54% | -14.32%-7.83% | -29.29%-18.14% | -31.53%-22.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPHB QDF | 27d81d | 105d50d | 151d128d | 765d560d |
Trading data
SPHB | QDF | |
Last sale 11/3/2026 at 2:30 PM | $137.10 | $90.24 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $134.99 | $90.35 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SPHB | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/3/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
SPHB | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $137.10 | $90.24 |
| 1D performance | +1.56% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $805.44 M | $2.17 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
SPHB | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Northern Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 High Beta Index | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 139 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 5, 2011 | December 14, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SPHB
USA
94.15%
Other
5.85%
QDF
USA
97.86%
Other
2.14%
Sectors
SPHB
Technology
50.89%
Industrials
14.94%
Finance
11.19%
Other
22.98%
QDF
Technology
43.75%
Finance
16.92%
Industrials
9.01%
Healthcare
8.31%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.08%
Other
14.93%
Advertisement
Diversification
SPHB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.04%
QDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.15%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
SPHB
Sandisk Corp.
2.84%
Moderna, Inc.
2.76%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.05%
Coinbase Global, Inc.
2.03%
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
2.03%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.03%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
1.92%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
1.81%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.66%
Intel Corp.
1.66%
Lam Research Corp.
1.59%
Western Digital Corp.
1.55%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
1.48%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.32%
Coherent Corp.
1.31%
QDF
Apple, Inc.
9.57%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.02%
Microsoft Corp.
4.60%
Johnson & Johnson
2.98%
Lam Research Corp.
2.92%
Broadcom Inc.
2.68%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.38%
GE Aerospace
2.30%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.93%
KLA Corp.
1.80%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.76%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.71%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.59%
GE Vernova, Inc.
1.44%
Frequently asked questions about SPHB and QDF
How have the SPHB and QDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, SPHB is up 15.87% year-to-date (YTD), while QDF has returned 12.95%. That puts SPHB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPHB or QDF?
Year-to-date, the SPHB ETF saw +$103M in flows, compared to -$87M for QDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPHB or QDF?
Over the past year, SPHB had a volatility of 28.82%, while QDF experienced 11.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPHB or QDF?
As of November 2, 2026, SPHB holds $805.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDF manages $2.17 B.
What sectors do the SPHB and QDF ETFs invest in?
SPHB leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, QDF focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SPHB ETF and QDF ETF?
SPHB top holdings include Sandisk Corp., Moderna, Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. QDF holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: SPHB or QDF?
SPHB holds 99 securities with 28.04% of its assets in the top 15. QDF has 140 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.15%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SPHB & QDF
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
QDF
Advertisement
Advertisement
