SPAMvsHACKETF Comparison
VS
Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) belong to the same industry segment: Cybersecurity. SPAM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Communication Services. In contrast, HACK's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials SPAM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for HACK. SPAM is up 2.02% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. HACK performs worse with -1.34% YTD performance, and -$100M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPAM and HACK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SPAM vs HACK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPAM HACK | +12.36%+9.28% | -2.11%-1.31% | +2.02%-1.34% | +8.11%+7.54% | n/a+76.97% | n/a+37.72% |
| Flows | SPAM HACK | --$19M | --$76M | --$100M | +$682K-$101M | --$280M | --$594M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPAM HACK | +34.07%+32.90% | +24.04%+23.00% | n/a+22.08% | n/a+23.40% |
| Max drawdown | SPAM HACK | -13.73%-11.78% | -23.70%-20.50% | n/a-21.58% | n/a-38.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPAM HACK | 82d83d | 201d202d | n/a106d | n/a1016d |
Trading data
SPAM | HACK | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.24 | $80.51 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $31.59 | $79.21 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.24 | $80.51 |
| 1D performance | -1.10% | +1.64% |
| AuM | $2.49 M | $1.97 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Themes Management Company | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Cybersecurity Index | ISE Cyber Security Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 22 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2023 | November 12, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SPAM
USA
74.16%
Other
25.84%
HACK
USA
87.62%
Israel
7.75%
Other
4.63%
Sectors
SPAM
Information Techn.
77.49%
Industrials
9.67%
Other
12.84%
HACK
Information Techn.
85.44%
Industrials
10.14%
Other
4.42%
Advertisement
Diversification
SPAM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.86%
HACK
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
SPAM
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
7.87%
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES
6.46%
CACI INTERNATIONAL
5.13%
FORTINET
5.10%
YANDEX
4.99%
CLEAR SECURE
4.94%
NEXTDC
4.70%
US21873S1087
4.64%
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING
4.54%
SENTINELONE
4.22%
OKTA
4.15%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
4.09%
TREND MICRO
4.09%
FASTLY INC
4.08%
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIS
3.86%
HACK
BROADCOM LIMITED
6.67%
CISCO-T
5.94%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
5.80%
CLOUDFLARE INC
5.62%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
5.51%
GENERAL DYNAMICS
5.14%
FORTINET
5.00%
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
5.00%
FASTLY INC
4.95%
F5 INC
4.49%
OKTA
4.46%
ZSCALER INC
4.19%
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIS
4.11%
A10 NETWORKS
3.90%
TREND MICRO
3.84%
Frequently asked questions about SPAM and HACK
How have the SPAM and HACK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 28, 2026, SPAM is up 2.02% year-to-date (YTD), while HACK has lost -1.34%. That puts SPAM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPAM or HACK?
Year-to-date, the SPAM ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$100M for HACK.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPAM or HACK?
Over the past year, SPAM had a volatility of 24.04%, while HACK experienced 23%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPAM or HACK?
As of April 28, 2026, SPAM holds $2.49 M in assets under management (AUM), while HACK manages $1.97 B.
What sectors do the SPAM and HACK ETFs invest in?
SPAM leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, HACK focuses on Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SPAM ETF and HACK ETF?
SPAM top holdings include PALO ALTO NETWORKS, AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES and CACI INTERNATIONAL. HACK holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, CISCO-T and PALO ALTO NETWORKS.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPAM or HACK?
SPAM holds 34 securities with 72.86% of its assets in the top 15. HACK has 22 securities and a top 15 weight of 74.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SPAM & HACK
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
HACK
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
HACK
Advertisement
Advertisement
