Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPAMvsHACKETF Comparison
Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) belong to the same industry segment: Cybersecurity. SPAM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Communication Services. In contrast, HACK's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials SPAM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for HACK. SPAM is down -1.86% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. HACK performs worse with -2.86% YTD performance, and -$77M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPAM and HACK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPAM vs HACK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPAM HACK | -1.11%+0.13% | -4.92%-4.56% | -1.86%-2.86% | +4.92%+9.08% | n/a+76.11% | n/a+36.42% |
| Flows | SPAM HACK | --$19M | --$92M | --$77M | +$682K-$151M | --$283M | --$607M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPAM HACK | +27.39%+23.93% | +24.86%+25.19% | n/a+21.17% | n/a+22.91% |
| Max drawdown | SPAM HACK | -14.49%-14.05% | -23.70%-20.50% | n/a-21.58% | n/a-38.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPAM HACK | 45d81d | 155d156d | n/a106d | n/a1016d |
SPAM | HACK | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.02 | $77.91 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $29.79 | $77.97 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.02 | $77.91 |
| 1D performance | +0.77% | -0.08% |
| AuM | $2.40 M | $1.96 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Themes Management Company | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Cybersecurity Index | ISE Cyber Security Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 30 | 23 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2023 | November 12, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPAM and HACK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SPAM is down -1.86% year-to-date (YTD), while HACK has lost -2.86%. That puts SPAM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPAM or HACK?
Year-to-date, the SPAM ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$77M for HACK.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPAM or HACK?
Over the past year, SPAM had a volatility of 24.86%, while HACK experienced 25.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPAM or HACK?
As of March 13, 2026, SPAM holds $2.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while HACK manages $1.96 B.
What sectors do the SPAM and HACK ETFs invest in?
SPAM leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, HACK focuses on Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SPAM ETF and HACK ETF?
SPAM top holdings include AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, CACI INTERNATIONAL and QUALYS. HACK holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, CISCO-T and NORTHROP GRUMMAN.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPAM or HACK?
SPAM holds 34 securities with 70.52% of its assets in the top 15. HACK has 23 securities and a top 15 weight of 74.57%.
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
