SPAMvsHACKETF Comparison
VS
Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) belong to the same industry segment: Cybersecurity. SPAM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Communication Services. In contrast, HACK's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials SPAM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for HACK. SPAM is up 24.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. HACK performs worse with 19.61% YTD performance, and +$54M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPAM and HACK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SPAM vs HACK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPAM HACK | +4.52%+5.40% | +26.11%+22.74% | +24.79%+19.61% | +19.28%+15.45% | n/a+91.01% | n/a+59.51% |
| Flows | SPAM HACK | +$2M+$154M | +$2M+$131M | +$2M+$54M | +$2M-$20M | --$83M | --$699M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPAM HACK | +34.70%+35.95% | +26.57%+25.79% | n/a+22.99% | n/a+23.98% |
| Max drawdown | SPAM HACK | -11.27%-10.73% | -23.70%-20.50% | n/a-21.58% | n/a-38.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPAM HACK | 17d16d | 218d219d | n/a106d | n/a1016d |
Trading data
SPAM | HACK | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.12 | $96.00 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $38.15 | $95.38 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.12 | $96.00 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.65% |
| AuM | $4.57 M | $2.54 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Themes Management Company | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Cybersecurity Index | ISE Cyber Security Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 22 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2023 | November 12, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SPAM
USA
71.45%
Other
28.55%
HACK
USA
88.97%
Israel
7.15%
Other
3.88%
Sectors
SPAM
Information Techn.
75.35%
Industrials
7.91%
Other
16.74%
HACK
Information Techn.
87.71%
Industrials
8.25%
Other
4.04%
Advertisement
Diversification
SPAM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.98%
HACK
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
75.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
SPAM
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
8.21%
YANDEX
6.89%
US21873S1087
6.61%
NEXTDC
5.65%
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES
4.95%
FORTINET
4.86%
CLEAR SECURE
4.85%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
4.31%
SENTINELONE
4.30%
CACI INTERNATIONAL
4.06%
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING
3.85%
TREND MICRO
3.81%
OKTA
3.68%
FASTLY INC
3.63%
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIS
3.32%
HACK
BROADCOM LIMITED
8.72%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS
6.30%
CISCO-T
6.25%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
6.05%
CLOUDFLARE INC
5.63%
FORTINET
4.97%
FASTLY INC
4.59%
A10 NETWORKS
4.43%
F5 INC
4.38%
GENERAL DYNAMICS
4.32%
OKTA
4.13%
SENTINELONE
3.97%
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
3.93%
US7811541090
3.89%
ZSCALER INC
3.76%
Frequently asked questions about SPAM and HACK
How have the SPAM and HACK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, SPAM is up 24.79% year-to-date (YTD), while HACK has returned 19.61%. That puts SPAM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPAM or HACK?
Year-to-date, the SPAM ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$54M for HACK.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPAM or HACK?
Over the past year, SPAM had a volatility of 26.57%, while HACK experienced 25.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPAM or HACK?
As of June 18, 2026, SPAM holds $4.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while HACK manages $2.54 B.
What sectors do the SPAM and HACK ETFs invest in?
SPAM leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, HACK focuses on Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SPAM ETF and HACK ETF?
SPAM top holdings include PALO ALTO NETWORKS, YANDEX and US21873S1087. HACK holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, PALO ALTO NETWORKS and CISCO-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPAM or HACK?
SPAM holds 34 securities with 72.98% of its assets in the top 15. HACK has 22 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.32%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SPAM & HACK
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
HACK
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
HACK
Advertisement
Advertisement
