SNAVvsQDFETF Comparison
VS
Mohr Sector Navigator ETF (SNAV) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF (QDF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. SNAV's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Energy. In contrast, QDF's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. SNAV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.59%, versus 0.4% for QDF. SNAV is up 11.76% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. QDF performs better with 14.31% YTD performance, and -$83M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SNAV and QDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SNAV vs QDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SNAV QDF | +1.33%+1.31% | +1.37%+1.04% | +11.76%+14.31% | +13.54%+17.97% | +51.33%+69.97% | n/a+75.33% |
| Flows | SNAV QDF | +$975K-$11M | +$5M-$29M | +$7M-$83M | +$6M-$73M | -$39M-$230M | --$268M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SNAV QDF | +9.90%+9.42% | +11.23%+11.84% | +12.91%+14.16% | n/a+15.75% |
| Max drawdown | SNAV QDF | -2.87%-3.54% | -6.44%-7.83% | -16.84%-18.14% | n/a-22.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | SNAV QDF | 53d63d | 60d50d | 207d128d | n/a560d |
Trading data
SNAV | QDF | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.61 | $90.78 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $39.06 | $91.44 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SNAV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSNAV | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SNAV | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.61 | $90.78 |
| 1D performance | -1.16% | -0.72% |
| AuM | $34.16 M | $2.20 B |
| E/R | 1.59% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
SNAV | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Mohr Funds | Northern Trust |
| Benchmark | - | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index |
| N° of holdings | 1454 | 112 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2023 | December 14, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SNAV
USA
95.11%
Other
4.89%
QDF
USA
96.45%
Other
3.55%
Sectors
SNAV
Technology
33.36%
Healthcare
20.7%
Energy
9.82%
Other
36.12%
QDF
Technology
40.91%
Finance
19.77%
Industrials
9.6%
Healthcare
9.36%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.17%
Other
13.19%
Advertisement
Diversification
SNAV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.55%
QDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.73%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
SNAV
NVIDIA Corp.
4.63%
Apple, Inc.
4.07%
Microsoft Corp.
3.18%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.75%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.69%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.95%
Johnson & Johnson
1.87%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.83%
Tesla, Inc.
1.69%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.48%
Broadcom Inc.
1.41%
Chevron Corp.
1.39%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.34%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.17%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.12%
QDF
Apple, Inc.
8.85%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.76%
Microsoft Corp.
4.32%
Broadcom Inc.
3.74%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.95%
Johnson & Johnson
2.90%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.76%
Lam Research Corp.
2.61%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.57%
GE Aerospace
2.46%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.22%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.87%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.86%
KLA Corp.
1.56%
Frequently asked questions about SNAV and QDF
How have the SNAV and QDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, SNAV is up 11.76% year-to-date (YTD), while QDF has returned 14.31%. That puts QDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SNAV or QDF?
Year-to-date, the SNAV ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to -$83M for QDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: SNAV or QDF?
Over the past year, SNAV had a volatility of 11.23%, while QDF experienced 11.84%.
Which ETF is bigger: SNAV or QDF?
As of October 15, 2026, SNAV holds $34.16 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDF manages $2.20 B.
What sectors do the SNAV and QDF ETFs invest in?
SNAV leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Energy. Meanwhile, QDF focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SNAV ETF and QDF ETF?
SNAV top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. QDF holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: SNAV or QDF?
SNAV holds 1460 securities with 32.55% of its assets in the top 15. QDF has 113 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.73%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SNAV & QDF
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
QDF
Advertisement
Advertisement
