SMAYvsJEPQETF Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May
FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May (SMAY) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. SMAY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.35% for JEPQ. SMAY is up 5.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. JEPQ performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$10.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMAY and JEPQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SMAY vs JEPQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMAY JEPQ | -1.91%+0.51% | -2.81%+2.60% | +5.78%+10.72% | +7.35%+15.71% | +36.70%+71.07% | n/an/a |
| Flows | SMAY JEPQ | +$1M+$1.45B | +$6M+$3.86B | +$13M+$10.33B | +$3M+$11.72B | +$63M+$33.68B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMAY JEPQ | +7.19%+13.96% | +7.04%+14.95% | +10.19%+15.77% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SMAY JEPQ | -5.38%-5.97% | -5.38%-8.85% | -14.07%-20.17% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SMAY JEPQ | 60d13d | 60d76d | 327d169d | n/an/a |
SMAY | JEPQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.23 | $58.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $27.50 | $60.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
SMAY | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.23 | $58.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.98% | -2.15% |
| AuM | $110.18 M | $43.34 B |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.35% |
SMAY | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 19, 2023 | May 3, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
