SIXOvsGPIXETF Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. SIXO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.74%, versus 0.35% for GPIX. SIXO is up 6.24% year-to-date (YTD) with -$302M in YTD flows. GPIX performs better with 13.06% YTD performance, and +$3.36B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SIXO and GPIX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SIXO vs GPIX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SIXO GPIX | +0.98%+1.72% | +2.28%+2.41% | +6.24%+13.06% | +8.81%+17.41% | +33.78%n/a | +44.84%n/a |
| Flows | SIXO GPIX | -$0K+$469M | -$6M+$1.40B | -$302M+$3.36B | -$30M+$4.11B | +$32M- | +$29M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SIXO GPIX | +2.24%+9.12% | +4.82%+11.06% | +7.63%n/a | +8.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SIXO GPIX | -0.41%-2.24% | -4.01%-7.71% | -12.02%n/a | -12.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SIXO GPIX | 14d15d | 63d47d | 149dn/a | 381dn/a |
SIXO | GPIX | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.60 | |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $56.10 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
SIXO | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $55.60 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.89% |
| AuM | $119.78 M | $6.22 B |
| E/R | 0.74% | 0.35% |
SIXO | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Allianz Investment Management LLC | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 1, 2021 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
