New

From idea to ETF portfolio in minutes. Build yours now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

SIVRvsGLTRETF Comparison

ETF 1
SIVR

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

This fund is part of
Metal ex-Gold
-4.38%
VS
ETF 2
GLTR

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

This fund is part of
Metal ex-Gold
-4.38%

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) belong to the same industry segment: Metal ex-Gold. SIVR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.6% for GLTR. SIVR is down -1.46% year-to-date (YTD) with -$580M in YTD flows. GLTR performs better with 6.59% YTD performance, and +$267M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SIVR and GLTR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

SIVR vs GLTR performance and flow charts

Performance

-30.0-25.0-20.0-15.0-10.0-5.00.05.0%Mar 2Mar 9Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30

Cumulative Flows

-400 M-300 M-200 M-100 M0 M100 MMar 2Mar 9Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/02/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
SIVR
GLTR
-24.99%-14.97%
-4.42%+4.44%
-1.46%+6.59%
+108.97%+69.69%
+194.06%+140.08%
+187.61%+136.02%
Flows
SIVR
GLTR
-$353M+$30M
-$580M+$267M
-$580M+$267M
+$624M+$644M
+$701M+$604M
+$973M+$774M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
SIVR
GLTR
+96.36%+58.35%
+54.92%+33.66%
+38.47%+23.09%
+34.44%+21.30%
Max drawdown
SIVR
GLTR
-43.27%-29.42%
-43.27%-29.42%
-43.27%-29.42%
-43.27%-29.42%
Max drawdown duration
SIVR
GLTR
63d62d
63d62d
63d62d
63d62d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
SIVR
GLTR
Last sale
4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
$69.11
$216.12
Previous close
04/02/2026
$71.57
$220.91
Consolidated volume
04/02/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
SIVR
GLTR
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SIVR
GLTR
Last price
$69.11
$216.12
1D performance
-3.44%
-2.17%
AuM$4.85 B$2.99 B
E/R0.3%0.6%
Characteristics
SIVR
GLTR
Management strategyPassivePassive
Providerabrdnabrdn
BenchmarkLBMA Silver Price IndexETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index
N° of holdings--
Asset classCommoditiesCommodities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJuly 24, 2009October 21, 2010
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

SIVR
Data will be available soon
GLTR
Data will be available soon

Sectors

SIVR
Data will be available soon
GLTR
Data will be available soon
Advertisement

Diversification

SIVR
Data will be available soon
GLTR
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970
SIVR
Data will be available soon
GLTR
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about SIVR and GLTR

How have the SIVR and GLTR ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 2, 2026, SIVR is down -1.46% year-to-date (YTD), while GLTR has returned 6.59%. That puts GLTR better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SIVR or GLTR?

Year-to-date, the SIVR ETF saw -$580M in flows, compared to +$267M for GLTR.

Which ETF is more volatile: SIVR or GLTR?

Over the past year, SIVR had a volatility of 54.92%, while GLTR experienced 33.66%.

Which ETF is bigger: SIVR or GLTR?

As of April 2, 2026, SIVR holds $4.85 B in assets under management (AUM), while GLTR manages $2.99 B.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Webcast on Demand

Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution

Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.

Accepted for 1 CE Credit

Calamos Webcast