SGLCvsFQALETF Comparison
VS
SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. SGLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.15% for FQAL. SGLC is up 20.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$71M in YTD flows. FQAL performs worse with 12.71% YTD performance, and +$131M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SGLC and FQAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SGLC vs FQAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/21/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SGLC FQAL | +1.40%+0.14% | +6.21%+5.37% | +20.14%+12.71% | +25.06%+14.38% | +86.02%+76.33% | n/a+77.90% |
| Flows | SGLC FQAL | +$2M-$165M | +$9M-$26M | +$71M+$131M | +$80M+$146M | +$55M+$616M | -+$731M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SGLC FQAL | +12.36%+9.22% | +14.30%+11.54% | +15.69%+13.94% | n/a+16.30% |
| Max drawdown | SGLC FQAL | -3.37%-3.20% | -10.17%-8.44% | -19.49%-16.70% | n/a-25.39% |
| Max drawdown duration | SGLC FQAL | 16d39d | 74d50d | 174d126d | n/a750d |
Trading data
SGLC | FQAL | |
Last sale 9/22/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.02 | $84.51 |
| Previous close 09/21/2026 | $46.08 | $84.42 |
| Consolidated volume 09/21/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SGLC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSGLC | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/22/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SGLC | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.02 | $84.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | +0.10% |
| AuM | $217.15 M | $1.44 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
SGLC | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Summit Global Investments | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 424 | 124 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 31, 2023 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SGLC
USA
98.95%
Other
1.05%
FQAL
USA
97.73%
Other
2.27%
Sectors
SGLC
Technology
43.53%
Finance
17.02%
Healthcare
9.8%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.65%
Other
21%
FQAL
Technology
42.52%
Finance
13.54%
Healthcare
9.52%
Industrials
7.72%
Other
26.71%
Diversification
SGLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.49%
FQAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.26%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
SGLC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.08%
Apple, Inc.
7.15%
Microsoft Corp.
4.74%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.39%
Broadcom Inc.
3.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.75%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.61%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.53%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.27%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.08%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
1.99%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.76%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.67%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.62%
FQAL
Apple, Inc.
7.97%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.57%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.25%
Microsoft Corp.
4.77%
Broadcom Inc.
3.29%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.03%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.02%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.88%
Visa, Inc.
1.49%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.46%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.44%
Johnson & Johnson
1.42%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.24%
Lam Research Corp.
1.21%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.21%
Frequently asked questions about SGLC and FQAL
How have the SGLC and FQAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 21, 2026, SGLC is up 20.14% year-to-date (YTD), while FQAL has returned 12.71%. That puts SGLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SGLC or FQAL?
Year-to-date, the SGLC ETF saw +$71M in flows, compared to +$131M for FQAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: SGLC or FQAL?
Over the past year, SGLC had a volatility of 14.3%, while FQAL experienced 11.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: SGLC or FQAL?
As of September 21, 2026, SGLC holds $217.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while FQAL manages $1.44 B.
What sectors do the SGLC and FQAL ETFs invest in?
SGLC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FQAL focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the SGLC ETF and FQAL ETF?
SGLC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. FQAL holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SGLC or FQAL?
SGLC holds 426 securities with 49.49% of its assets in the top 15. FQAL has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.26%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SGLC & FQAL
Advertisement
