SETMvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. SETM's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. SETM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.52% for NLR. SETM is up 17.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$347M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -0.19% YTD performance, and +$890M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SETM and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SETM vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/07/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SETM NLR | +4.27%+5.40% | +2.02%-0.13% | +17.85%-0.19% | +55.36%+5.25% | +104.03%+102.26% | n/a+152.10% |
| Flows | SETM NLR | +$14M-$47M | -$4M-$232M | +$347M+$890M | +$481M+$2.14B | +$542M+$3.99B | -+$4.04B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SETM NLR | +37.90%+37.35% | +39.28%+39.16% | +31.96%+32.51% | n/a+27.56% |
| Max drawdown | SETM NLR | -21.45%-19.34% | -29.16%-36.67% | -41.59%-36.67% | n/a-36.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | SETM NLR | 70d79d | 222d223d | 427d223d | n/a223d |
Trading data
SETM | NLR | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.56 | $122.95 |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $34.50 | $123.57 |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SETM | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SETM | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.56 | $122.95 |
| 1D performance | +0.17% | -0.50% |
| AuM | $619.45 M | $4.31 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.52% |
Characteristics
SETM | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 158 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SETM
Canada
32.5%
USA
22.74%
Australia
20.68%
Other
24.09%
NLR
USA
51.08%
Canada
18.8%
Australia
7.41%
Other
22.71%
Sectors
SETM
Non-Energy Materi.
74.36%
Energy
24%
Other
1.63%
NLR
Energy
39.26%
Utilities
31.2%
Industrials
23.85%
Other
5.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
SETM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.66%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
83.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
SETM
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
5.82%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
5.35%
Cameco Corp.
4.68%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
4.38%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.84%
Teck Resources Limited
3.60%
Albemarle Corp.
3.50%
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura SAA
3.29%
Uranium Energy Corp.
3.27%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
3.10%
Antofagasta Plc
2.95%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
2.87%
MP Materials Corp.
2.75%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.67%
First Majestic Silver Corp.
2.60%
NLR
Constellation Energy Corp.
9.13%
Cameco Corp.
7.79%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
7.24%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.17%
Fortum Oyj
5.91%
Centrus Energy Corp.
5.69%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.27%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.88%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.87%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.61%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.53%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.45%
Oklo, Inc.
4.39%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.37%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.04%
Frequently asked questions about SETM and NLR
How have the SETM and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 7, 2026, SETM is up 17.85% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -0.19%. That puts SETM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SETM or NLR?
Year-to-date, the SETM ETF saw +$347M in flows, compared to +$890M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: SETM or NLR?
Over the past year, SETM had a volatility of 39.28%, while NLR experienced 39.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: SETM or NLR?
As of September 7, 2026, SETM holds $619.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $4.31 B.
What sectors do the SETM and NLR ETFs invest in?
SETM leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SETM ETF and NLR ETF?
SETM top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC and Cameco Corp.. NLR holds in its top three: Constellation Energy Corp., Cameco Corp. and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SETM or NLR?
SETM holds 158 securities with 54.66% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 83.33%.
Advertisement
Latest news about SETM & NLR
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
SETM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
SETM
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
Advertisement
