Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHXvsPBPETF Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) is part of the Options Strategies segment. SCHX's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, PBP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. SCHX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.29% for PBP. SCHX is down -0.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$624M in YTD flows. PBP performs better with 1.51% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHX and PBP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHX vs PBP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHX PBP | -2.31%-0.21% | -1.80%+2.74% | -0.91%+1.51% | +22.81%+15.20% | +82.80%+44.47% | +78.95%+49.19% |
| Flows | SCHX PBP | +$351M+$1M | +$953M+$13M | +$624M-$2M | +$3.11B+$191M | +$9.90B+$220M | +$14.06B+$153M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHX PBP | +11.73%+7.34% | +18.70%+13.89% | +15.13%+10.22% | +17.20%+11.25% |
| Max drawdown | SCHX PBP | -3.41%-1.67% | -13.95%-10.83% | -19.16%-15.51% | -25.39%-18.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHX PBP | 58d14d | 45d90d | 126d240d | 715d679d |
SCHX | PBP | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:41 PM | $26.45 | $22.75 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $26.66 | $22.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHX | PBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHX | PBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.45 | $22.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.79% | +0.09% |
| AuM | $63.37 B | $326.98 M |
| E/R | 0.03% | 0.29% |
SCHX | PBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index | CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 642 | 479 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 3, 2009 | December 20, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHX and PBP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHX is down -0.91% year-to-date (YTD), while PBP has returned 1.51%. That puts PBP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHX or PBP?
Year-to-date, the SCHX ETF saw +$624M in flows, compared to -$2M for PBP.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHX or PBP?
Over the past year, SCHX had a volatility of 18.7%, while PBP experienced 13.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHX or PBP?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHX holds $63.37 B in assets under management (AUM), while PBP manages $326.98 M.
What sectors do the SCHX and PBP ETFs invest in?
SCHX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, PBP focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SCHX ETF and PBP ETF?
SCHX top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. PBP holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHX or PBP?
SCHX holds 695 securities with 43.59% of its assets in the top 15. PBP has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.54%.
Charles Schwab Asset Management Celebrates 15-Year ETF Anniversary: 3 ETFs to Watch
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 1: A Grand Overview
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
