Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHVvsVONVETF Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. SCHV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, VONV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. SCHV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.06% for VONV. SCHV is up 4.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$162M in YTD flows. VONV performs worse with 3.5% YTD performance, and +$1.47B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHV and VONV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHV vs VONV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHV VONV | -3.63%-3.21% | +4.11%+2.76% | +4.87%+3.50% | +21.05%+20.07% | +57.48%+57.97% | +61.32%+59.67% |
| Flows | SCHV VONV | +$153M+$1.40B | +$211M+$1.61B | +$162M+$1.47B | +$1.02B+$3.54B | +$1.12B+$6.05B | +$1.85B+$8.82B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHV VONV | +10.96%+10.68% | +15.48%+15.63% | +12.85%+13.06% | +14.50%+14.96% |
| Max drawdown | SCHV VONV | -3.71%-3.52% | -11.95%-12.06% | -15.13%-15.61% | -19.73%-19.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHV VONV | 13d10d | 51d52d | 208d213d | 752d700d |
SCHV | VONV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.04 | $95.51 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $31.09 | $95.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHV | VONV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHV | VONV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.04 | $95.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | -0.23% |
| AuM | $15.07 B | $16.45 B |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.06% |
SCHV | VONV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index | Russell 1000 Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 520 | 789 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2009 | September 20, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHV and VONV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHV is up 4.87% year-to-date (YTD), while VONV has returned 3.5%. That puts SCHV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHV or VONV?
Year-to-date, the SCHV ETF saw +$162M in flows, compared to +$1.47B for VONV.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHV or VONV?
Over the past year, SCHV had a volatility of 15.48%, while VONV experienced 15.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHV or VONV?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHV holds $15.07 B in assets under management (AUM), while VONV manages $16.45 B.
What sectors do the SCHV and VONV ETFs invest in?
SCHV leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, VONV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the SCHV ETF and VONV ETF?
SCHV top holdings include BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and EXXON. VONV holds in its top three: BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHV or VONV?
SCHV holds 553 securities with 24.14% of its assets in the top 15. VONV has 869 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.03%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
