Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHGvsPRXGETF Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. SCHG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.36% for PRXG. SCHG is down -5.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$808M in YTD flows. PRXG performs better with -4.63% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHG and PRXG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHG vs PRXG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHG PRXG | -1.07%-1.32% | -6.73%-5.54% | -5.54%-4.63% | +23.18%n/a | +109.76%n/a | +93.87%n/a |
| Flows | SCHG PRXG | +$197M-$52K | +$1.25B+$7M | +$808M+$4M | +$7.39B- | +$16.59B- | +$19.73B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHG PRXG | +15.30%+15.60% | +23.06%n/a | +19.55%n/a | +22.46%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SCHG PRXG | -8.06%-7.06% | -15.72%n/a | -23.41%n/a | -34.60%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHG PRXG | 76d73d | 45dn/a | 193dn/a | 754dn/a |
SCHG | PRXG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.25 | $34.21 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.80 | $34.81 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHG | PRXG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHG | PRXG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.25 | $34.21 |
| 1D performance | -1.79% | -1.72% |
| AuM | $50.74 B | $72.21 M |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.36% |
SCHG | PRXG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Praxis |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 169 | 163 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2009 | April 7, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHG and PRXG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHG is down -5.54% year-to-date (YTD), while PRXG has lost -4.63%. That puts PRXG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHG or PRXG?
Year-to-date, the SCHG ETF saw +$808M in flows, compared to +$4M for PRXG.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHG or PRXG?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHG holds $50.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while PRXG manages $72.21 M.
What sectors do the SCHG and PRXG ETFs invest in?
SCHG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, PRXG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SCHG ETF and PRXG ETF?
SCHG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. PRXG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHG or PRXG?
SCHG holds 189 securities with 67.64% of its assets in the top 15. PRXG has 174 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.91%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
