Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHGvsGGUSETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. SCHG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, GGUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. SCHG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.12% for GGUS. SCHG is down -5.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$738M in YTD flows. GGUS performs better with -3.56% YTD performance, and +$21M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHG and GGUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHG vs GGUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHG GGUS | -1.46%-1.64% | -6.57%-4.16% | -5.48%-3.56% | +23.23%+24.18% | +111.33%n/a | +98.58%n/a |
| Flows | SCHG GGUS | +$128M+$25M | +$1.18B+$25M | +$738M+$21M | +$7.31B+$83M | +$16.52B- | +$19.66B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHG GGUS | +15.30%+14.94% | +23.06%+21.89% | +19.55%n/a | +22.48%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SCHG GGUS | -8.06%-6.66% | -15.72%-15.24% | -23.41%n/a | -34.60%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHG GGUS | 75d74d | 45d45d | 193dn/a | 754dn/a |
SCHG | GGUS | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.80 | $61.20 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $30.82 | $61.23 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHG | GGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHG | GGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.80 | $61.20 |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | -0.05% |
| AuM | $50.70 B | $405.04 M |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.12% |
SCHG | GGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 169 | 349 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2009 | November 29, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHG and GGUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, SCHG is down -5.48% year-to-date (YTD), while GGUS has lost -3.56%. That puts GGUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHG or GGUS?
Year-to-date, the SCHG ETF saw +$738M in flows, compared to +$21M for GGUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHG or GGUS?
Over the past year, SCHG had a volatility of 23.06%, while GGUS experienced 21.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHG or GGUS?
As of March 10, 2026, SCHG holds $50.70 B in assets under management (AUM), while GGUS manages $405.04 M.
What sectors do the SCHG and GGUS ETFs invest in?
SCHG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GGUS focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the SCHG ETF and GGUS ETF?
SCHG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GGUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHG or GGUS?
SCHG holds 189 securities with 67.64% of its assets in the top 15. GGUS has 388 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.61%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
