Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHGvsAGRWETF Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. SCHG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.35% for AGRW. SCHG is down -5.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$808M in YTD flows. AGRW performs better with -4.28% YTD performance, and -$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHG and AGRW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHG vs AGRW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHG AGRW | -1.07%-1.06% | -6.73%-5.96% | -5.54%-4.28% | +23.18%n/a | +109.76%n/a | +93.87%n/a |
| Flows | SCHG AGRW | +$197M- | +$1.25B-$26M | +$808M-$24M | +$7.39B- | +$16.59B- | +$19.73B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHG AGRW | +15.30%+15.85% | +23.06%n/a | +19.55%n/a | +22.46%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SCHG AGRW | -8.06%-7.75% | -15.72%n/a | -23.41%n/a | -34.60%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHG AGRW | 76d90d | 45dn/a | 193dn/a | 754dn/a |
SCHG | AGRW | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.25 | $28.87 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.80 | $28.87 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHG | AGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHG | AGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.25 | $28.87 |
| 1D performance | -1.79% | -0.00% |
| AuM | $50.74 B | $100.68 M |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.35% |
SCHG | AGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Allspring |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 169 | 42 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2009 | March 26, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHG and AGRW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHG is down -5.54% year-to-date (YTD), while AGRW has lost -4.28%. That puts AGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHG or AGRW?
Year-to-date, the SCHG ETF saw +$808M in flows, compared to -$24M for AGRW.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHG or AGRW?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHG holds $50.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while AGRW manages $100.68 M.
What sectors do the SCHG and AGRW ETFs invest in?
SCHG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, AGRW focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the SCHG ETF and AGRW ETF?
SCHG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. AGRW holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHG or AGRW?
SCHG holds 189 securities with 67.64% of its assets in the top 15. AGRW has 43 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.72%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
