Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHBvsIWBETF Comparison
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) belongs to the US All Cap segment. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. SCHB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.03%, versus 0.15% for IWB. SCHB is down -2.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$205M in YTD flows. IWB performs worse with -2.89% YTD performance, and +$172M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHB and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHB vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHB IWB | -3.15%-3.00% | -2.50%-2.53% | -2.78%-2.89% | +21.61%+21.27% | +76.47%+77.49% | +67.99%+71.72% |
| Flows | SCHB IWB | +$115M+$404M | +$350M+$543M | +$205M+$172M | +$502M+$1.39B | +$2.58B-$464M | +$4.84B+$662M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHB IWB | +12.13%+12.20% | +18.85%+18.43% | +15.31%+15.02% | +17.39%+17.13% |
| Max drawdown | SCHB IWB | -5.01%-4.90% | -14.10%-13.95% | -19.42%-19.16% | -25.37%-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHB IWB | 45d45d | 45d45d | 127d126d | 711d709d |
SCHB | IWB | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.50 | $362.62 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.65 | $364.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHB | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHB | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.50 | $362.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.58% | -0.54% |
| AuM | $37.31 B | $45.12 B |
| E/R | 0.03% | 0.15% |
SCHB | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 1415 | 914 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 3, 2009 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHB and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SCHB is down -2.78% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has lost -2.89%. That puts SCHB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHB or IWB?
Year-to-date, the SCHB ETF saw +$205M in flows, compared to +$172M for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHB or IWB?
Over the past year, SCHB had a volatility of 18.85%, while IWB experienced 18.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHB or IWB?
As of March 13, 2026, SCHB holds $37.31 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $45.12 B.
What sectors do the SCHB and IWB ETFs invest in?
SCHB leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the SCHB ETF and IWB ETF?
SCHB top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHB or IWB?
SCHB holds 1572 securities with 42% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1008 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.55%.
Charles Schwab Asset Management Celebrates 15-Year ETF Anniversary: 3 ETFs to Watch
ETF Tax Loss Harvesting: How to Use the ETF Central Comparison Tool
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
