Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RVRBvsBKLCETF Comparison
Reverb ETF (RVRB) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. RVRB's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, BKLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. RVRB is down -0.95% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. BKLC performs better with -0.69% YTD performance, and +$382M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RVRB and BKLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RVRB vs BKLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RVRB BKLC | -2.06%-2.24% | -1.52%-0.67% | -0.95%-0.69% | +23.03%+22.90% | +83.62%+87.66% | n/a+90.64% |
| Flows | RVRB BKLC | -+$197M | -+$414M | -+$382M | -+$1.58B | +$1M+$2.26B | -+$3.72B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RVRB BKLC | +11.43%+11.86% | +18.19%+18.43% | +14.93%+15.14% | n/a+17.54% |
| Max drawdown | RVRB BKLC | -3.47%-3.45% | -13.87%-13.92% | -19.22%-19.17% | n/a-26.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | RVRB BKLC | 41d41d | 45d45d | 126d126d | n/a707d |
RVRB | BKLC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.01 | $129.41 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $35.03 | $129.50 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RVRB | BKLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RVRB | BKLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.01 | $129.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $5.26 M | $5.27 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0% |
RVRB | BKLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Distribution Cognizant | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS United States 500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 465 | 470 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 3, 2022 | April 7, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RVRB and BKLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, RVRB is down -0.95% year-to-date (YTD), while BKLC has lost -0.69%. That puts BKLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RVRB or BKLC?
Year-to-date, the RVRB ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$382M for BKLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: RVRB or BKLC?
Over the past year, RVRB had a volatility of 18.19%, while BKLC experienced 18.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: RVRB or BKLC?
As of March 10, 2026, RVRB holds $5.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while BKLC manages $5.27 B.
What sectors do the RVRB and BKLC ETFs invest in?
RVRB leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, BKLC focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RVRB ETF and BKLC ETF?
RVRB top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and MICROSOFT-T. BKLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: RVRB or BKLC?
RVRB holds 492 securities with 44.17% of its assets in the top 15. BKLC has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.93%.
State Street Global Advisors' 2024 US ETF Impact Survey: Key Takeaways and ETFs to Watch
Meet the Ultra-Affordable, Zero-Expense Ratio ETFs from BNY Mellon
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
