Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RSPFvsXLFETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) belong to the same industry segment: US Financials. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials and Information Technology. RSPF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.08% for XLF. RSPF is down -9.66% year-to-date (YTD) with -$17M in YTD flows. XLF performs worse with -10.79% YTD performance, and -$1.80B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RSPF and XLF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RSPF vs XLF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSPF XLF | -4.78%-5.50% | -10.07%-10.77% | -9.66%-10.79% | +2.75%+3.83% | +51.92%+62.14% | +36.69%+53.07% |
| Flows | RSPF XLF | -$14M-$4.38B | -$19M-$2.31B | -$17M-$1.80B | -$42M-$4.74B | -$184M+$802M | -$72M-$4.04B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RSPF XLF | +16.60%+16.83% | +19.97%+19.34% | +17.44%+16.47% | +19.84%+18.73% |
| Max drawdown | RSPF XLF | -12.32%-13.39% | -13.69%-13.39% | -17.97%-15.51% | -27.67%-25.84% |
| Max drawdown duration | RSPF XLF | 65d65d | 45d65d | 213d116d | 915d770d |
RSPF | XLF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:52 PM | $71.31 | $49.12 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $70.85 | $48.83 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RSPF | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RSPF | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.31 | $49.12 |
| 1D performance | +0.65% | +0.59% |
| AuM | $260.61 M | $45.52 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.08% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RSPF and XLF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RSPF is down -9.66% year-to-date (YTD), while XLF has lost -10.79%. That puts RSPF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RSPF or XLF?
Year-to-date, the RSPF ETF saw -$17M in flows, compared to -$1.80B for XLF.
Which ETF is more volatile: RSPF or XLF?
Over the past year, RSPF had a volatility of 19.97%, while XLF experienced 19.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: RSPF or XLF?
As of March 12, 2026, RSPF holds $260.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while XLF manages $45.52 B.
What sectors do the RSPF and XLF ETFs invest in?
RSPF leans toward sectors like Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, XLF focuses on Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the RSPF ETF and XLF ETF?
RSPF top holdings include INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP, MSCI and FRANKLIN RSC. XLF holds in its top three: BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and VISA INCORPORATION.
Which ETF is more diversified: RSPF or XLF?
RSPF holds 76 securities with 21.33% of its assets in the top 15. XLF has 76 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.26%.
Investing in Sector ETFs: Financials and Real Estate
May 2024 U.S. Sector ETFs Inflows and Outflows Breakdown
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Equal-Weight ETFs
The Top Three Moments That Moved ETF Markets in 2023
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
