Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RSPDvsRTHETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and VanEck Retail ETF (RTH) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Discretionary. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Consumer Discretionary. RSPD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.35% for RTH. RSPD is down -4.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$52M in YTD flows. RTH performs better with 3.5% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RSPD and RTH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RSPD vs RTH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSPD RTH | -7.79%-1.50% | -6.01%+1.70% | -4.68%+3.50% | +9.59%+16.91% | +37.91%+72.40% | +21.33%+71.25% |
| Flows | RSPD RTH | +$64M+$1K | +$58M+$5M | +$52M+$5M | -$36M-$5M | -$388M+$19M | -$476M-$25M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RSPD RTH | +16.70%+11.07% | +22.65%+14.99% | +18.82%+13.46% | +21.92%+16.71% |
| Max drawdown | RSPD RTH | -9.42%-3.11% | -14.36%-9.15% | -21.07%-13.84% | -34.36%-24.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | RSPD RTH | 58d36d | 46d29d | 213d182d | 1044d804d |
RSPD | RTH | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.08 | $255.11 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.34 | $256.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RSPD | RTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RSPD | RTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.08 | $255.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.48% | -0.42% |
| AuM | $264.09 M | $261.12 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.35% |
RSPD | RTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VanEck |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary Index | MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 1, 2006 | December 20, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RSPD and RTH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RSPD is down -4.68% year-to-date (YTD), while RTH has returned 3.5%. That puts RTH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RSPD or RTH?
Year-to-date, the RSPD ETF saw +$52M in flows, compared to +$5M for RTH.
Which ETF is more volatile: RSPD or RTH?
Over the past year, RSPD had a volatility of 22.65%, while RTH experienced 14.99%.
Which ETF is bigger: RSPD or RTH?
As of March 12, 2026, RSPD holds $264.09 M in assets under management (AUM), while RTH manages $261.12 M.
What sectors do the RSPD and RTH ETFs invest in?
RSPD leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, RTH focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RSPD ETF and RTH ETF?
RSPD top holdings include CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, STARBUCKS-T and EBAY. RTH holds in its top three: AMAZON.COM INC, WALMART INC and COSTCO WHOLESALE.
Which ETF is more diversified: RSPD or RTH?
RSPD holds 48 securities with 33.7% of its assets in the top 15. RTH has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 85.39%.
There's an ETF for That? Black Friday & Cyber Monday Retail
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Equal-Weight ETFs
2023 Holiday Outlook: Retail ETFs to Keep on Your Watchlist
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
