Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RPGvsJGROETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. RPG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, JGRO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. RPG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.44% for JGRO. RPG is up 1.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. JGRO performs worse with -9.5% YTD performance, and +$483M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RPG and JGRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RPG vs JGRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPG JGRO | -6.01%-6.15% | -1.18%-10.27% | +1.14%-9.50% | +20.59%+11.78% | +65.39%+79.90% | +49.14%n/a |
| Flows | RPG JGRO | +$34M+$242M | +$2M+$528M | +$2M+$483M | -$194M+$2.89B | -$1.17B+$7.20B | -$1.56B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RPG JGRO | +21.33%+15.13% | +24.91%+21.59% | +20.70%+19.19% | +23.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RPG JGRO | -6.04%-10.98% | -16.06%-15.30% | -24.81%-22.81% | -35.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RPG JGRO | 22d85d | 37d45d | 127d154d | 1100dn/a |
RPG | JGRO | |
Last sale 3/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.23 | $84.02 |
| Previous close 03/19/2026 | $48.60 | $85.63 |
| Consolidated volume 03/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RPG | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RPG | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.23 | $84.02 |
| 1D performance | -2.82% | -1.88% |
| AuM | $1.59 B | $8.16 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.44% |
RPG | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Pure Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 55 | 109 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | August 8, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RPG and JGRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 20, 2026, RPG is up 1.14% year-to-date (YTD), while JGRO has lost -9.5%. That puts RPG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RPG or JGRO?
Year-to-date, the RPG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$483M for JGRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: RPG or JGRO?
Over the past year, RPG had a volatility of 24.91%, while JGRO experienced 21.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: RPG or JGRO?
As of March 20, 2026, RPG holds $1.59 B in assets under management (AUM), while JGRO manages $8.16 B.
What sectors do the RPG and JGRO ETFs invest in?
RPG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, JGRO focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RPG ETF and JGRO ETF?
RPG top holdings include US80004C2008, COMFORT SYSTEMS USA and BERKSHIRE HATHWAY. JGRO holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: RPG or JGRO?
RPG holds 60 securities with 36.86% of its assets in the top 15. JGRO has 117 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.41%.
Equity Investing 101: Understanding U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFs
U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFs to Watch
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
