RFLRvsIWMIETF Comparison
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. RFLR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.78% for IWMI. RFLR is up 14.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$42M in YTD flows. IWMI performs better with 16.37% YTD performance, and +$613M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFLR and IWMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFLR vs IWMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFLR IWMI | -0.49%-1.14% | +8.49%+6.89% | +14.40%+16.37% | +24.70%+29.66% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | RFLR IWMI | +$2M+$124M | +$11M+$301M | +$42M+$613M | +$59M+$830M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFLR IWMI | +11.94%+14.61% | +12.94%+15.28% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RFLR IWMI | -3.13%-3.47% | -5.65%-8.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RFLR IWMI | 12d16d | 43d46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
RFLR | IWMI | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.19 | $51.26 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $32.46 | $52.15 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
RFLR | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.19 | $51.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.82% | -1.71% |
| AuM | $92.47 M | $1.11 B |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.78% |
RFLR | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 813 | 1944 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 16, 2024 | June 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
