BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

RFGvsBULETF Comparison

ETF 1

RFG

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF

This fund is part of

US Mid Cap Growth

+2.21%

Full RFG fund page

VS

ETF 2

BUL

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

This fund is part of

US Large Cap Growth

+0.63%

Full BUL fund page

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. RFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. In contrast, BUL's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Information Technology. RFG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for BUL. RFG is up 13.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. BUL performs worse with 2.43% YTD performance, and +$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and BUL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

RFG vs BUL performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 04/30/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	RFG BUL	+12.68%+7.79%	+8.24%+1.00%	+13.56%+2.43%	+34.99%+27.29%	+65.74%+64.90%	+33.97%+61.54%
Flows	RFG BUL	+$5M+$3M	+$6M+$3M	+$7M+$11M	-$24M+$35M	-$44M+$57M	-$124M+$96M

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	RFG BUL	+23.73%+19.11%	+18.26%+17.34%	+19.94%+19.29%	+22.71%+21.73%
Max drawdown	RFG BUL	-10.42%-9.07%	-10.42%-9.07%	-26.58%-23.19%	-35.14%-27.24%
Max drawdown duration	RFG BUL	45d49d	45d49d	380d210d	836d855d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	RFG	BUL
Last sale 4/30/2026 at 7:59 PM	$59.54	$57.09
Previous close 04/29/2026	$58.47	$56.47
Consolidated volume 04/29/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of April 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	RFG	BUL
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 4/30/2026 at 7:59 PM

Live

Closed

	RFG	BUL
Last price	$59.54	$57.09
1D performance	+1.83%	+1.10%
AuM	$334.56 M	$127.03 M
E/R	0.35%	0.6%

Characteristics

	RFG	BUL
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Invesco	PACER ETFs
Benchmark	S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index	Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index
N° of holdings	92	50
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	March 1, 2006	May 2, 2019
ESG	No	No

More RFG data on Trackinsight

More BUL data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

RFG

USA

88.84%

Other

11.16%

BUL

USA

86.61%

Other

13.39%

Sectors

RFG

Industrials

25.15%

Health Care

20.75%

Information Techn.

16.53%

Consumer Discreti.

8.85%

Materials

7.81%

Other

20.91%

BUL

Consumer Discreti.

24.34%

Health Care

23.32%

Information Techn.

20.64%

Industrials

17.3%

Other

14.4%

Diversification

RFG

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

29.56%

BUL

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

57.24%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of March 31, 2026

RFG

VALARIS LTD

2.60%

TECHNIPFMC PLC

2.57%

WOODWARD

2.12%

MICHAEL STORES

2.05%

INTERDIGITAL

2.04%

ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC

2.04%

FIVE BELOW

1.98%

STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC

1.94%

CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY

1.93%

FABRINET

1.87%

HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS

1.85%

HECLA MINING

1.69%

MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC

1.67%

CURTISS WRIGHT

1.62%

FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC

1.61%

BUL

BOOKING HOLDINGS

5.01%

UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC

4.93%

NEWMONT CORP

4.86%

CARNIVAL

4.64%

HCA HEALTHCARE

4.54%

EMCOR GROUP

4.23%

EXPEDIA GROUP INC

3.76%

TAPESTRY INC

3.76%

TECHNIPFMC PLC

3.66%

UTD THERAPEUT

3.49%

VERISIGN

3.10%

ULTA BEAUTY

3.07%

FLEX LTD

3.02%

FIRST SOLAR

2.69%

TWILIO

2.48%

Frequently asked questions about RFG and BUL

How have the RFG and BUL ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 30, 2026, RFG is up 13.56% year-to-date (YTD), while BUL has returned 2.43%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or BUL?

Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$11M for BUL.

Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or BUL?

Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 18.26%, while BUL experienced 17.34%.

Which ETF is bigger: RFG or BUL?

As of April 30, 2026, RFG holds $334.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while BUL manages $127.03 M.

What sectors do the RFG and BUL ETFs invest in?

RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. Meanwhile, BUL focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Information Technology.

What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and BUL ETF?

RFG top holdings include VALARIS LTD, TECHNIPFMC PLC and WOODWARD. BUL holds in its top three: BOOKING HOLDINGS, UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC and NEWMONT CORP.

Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or BUL?

RFG holds 95 securities with 29.56% of its assets in the top 15. BUL has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.24%.

There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow

October 10, 2024

BUL

Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks

April 28, 2023

BUL

RFGvsBULETF Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

RFG vs BUL performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the RFG and BUL ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 30, 2026, RFG is up 13.56% year-to-date (YTD), while BUL has returned 2.43%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or BUL?

Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$11M for BUL.

Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or BUL?

Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 18.26%, while BUL experienced 17.34%.

Which ETF is bigger: RFG or BUL?

As of April 30, 2026, RFG holds $334.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while BUL manages $127.03 M.

What sectors do the RFG and BUL ETFs invest in?

RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. Meanwhile, BUL focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Information Technology.

What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and BUL ETF?

RFG top holdings include VALARIS LTD, TECHNIPFMC PLC and WOODWARD. BUL holds in its top three: BOOKING HOLDINGS, UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC and NEWMONT CORP.

Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or BUL?

RFG holds 95 securities with 29.56% of its assets in the top 15. BUL has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.24%.

There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow

Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks

Expert-Built ETF Portfolios, All in One Place