Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFGvsBULETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. RFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. In contrast, BUL's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. RFG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for BUL. RFG is up 4.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. BUL performs worse with -1.65% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and BUL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFG vs BUL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFG BUL | -3.92%-4.06% | +3.85%-2.18% | +4.39%-1.65% | +27.59%+26.27% | +59.30%+66.16% | +26.40%+60.73% |
| Flows | RFG BUL | +$549K+$6K | -$936K+$16M | +$2M+$8M | -$41M+$30M | -$53M+$51M | -$138M+$94M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFG BUL | +19.62%+15.13% | +22.80%+23.13% | +19.73%+19.34% | +22.64%+21.74% |
| Max drawdown | RFG BUL | -7.22%-5.89% | -14.87%-15.97% | -26.58%-23.19% | -35.14%-27.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFG BUL | 11d15d | 44d44d | 380d210d | 836d855d |
RFG | BUL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.75 | $54.24 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.97 | $54.43 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFG | BUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFG | BUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.75 | $54.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $302.68 M | $119.26 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
RFG | BUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index | Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 87 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | May 2, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFG and BUL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, RFG is up 4.39% year-to-date (YTD), while BUL has lost -1.65%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or BUL?
Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$8M for BUL.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or BUL?
Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 22.8%, while BUL experienced 23.13%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFG or BUL?
As of March 13, 2026, RFG holds $302.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while BUL manages $119.26 M.
What sectors do the RFG and BUL ETFs invest in?
RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. Meanwhile, BUL focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and BUL ETF?
RFG top holdings include HECLA MINING, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and AEROVIRONMENT. BUL holds in its top three: NEWMONT CORP, HCA HEALTHCARE and CARNIVAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or BUL?
RFG holds 91 securities with 29.38% of its assets in the top 15. BUL has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.78%.
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
