Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFGvsBCSMETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. In contrast, BCSM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. RFG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.75% for BCSM. RFG is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. BCSM performs worse with -5.18% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and BCSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFG vs BCSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFG BCSM | -1.84%-1.15% | +4.01%-5.72% | +4.77%-5.18% | +25.39%n/a | +59.87%n/a | +28.98%n/a |
| Flows | RFG BCSM | -$10K+$686K | -$936K+$19M | +$2M+$3M | -$41M- | -$53M- | -$138M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFG BCSM | +19.61%+18.30% | +22.90%n/a | +19.74%n/a | +22.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RFG BCSM | -6.88%-11.12% | -14.87%n/a | -26.58%n/a | -35.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RFG BCSM | 10d55d | 44dn/a | 380dn/a | 836dn/a |
RFG | BCSM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.75 | $22.14 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.97 | $22.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFG | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFG | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.75 | $22.14 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $303.76 M | $17.82 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.75% |
RFG | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Baron Capital |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 87 | 39 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | December 12, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFG and BCSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RFG is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD), while BCSM has lost -5.18%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or BCSM?
Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$3M for BCSM.
Which ETF is bigger: RFG or BCSM?
As of March 12, 2026, RFG holds $303.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while BCSM manages $17.82 M.
What sectors do the RFG and BCSM ETFs invest in?
RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. Meanwhile, BCSM focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and BCSM ETF?
RFG top holdings include HECLA MINING, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and AEROVIRONMENT. BCSM holds in its top three: MERCURY SYSTEMS INC, US19247G1076 and BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or BCSM?
RFG holds 91 securities with 29.38% of its assets in the top 15. BCSM has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.14%.
Ask the Manager: Michael Baron on the Case for Active Management
Baron Capital Debuts Three Active ETFs on NYSE
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
