Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
REVSvsSCHVETF Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. REVS's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, SCHV's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. REVS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.04% for SCHV. REVS is up 1.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$74M in YTD flows. SCHV performs better with 3.49% YTD performance, and +$156M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of REVS and SCHV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
REVS vs SCHV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REVS SCHV | -3.72%-3.83% | +0.55%+3.25% | +1.84%+3.49% | +19.40%+20.03% | +60.84%+55.41% | +71.76%+58.04% |
| Flows | REVS SCHV | +$13M+$119M | +$79M+$201M | +$74M+$156M | +$138M+$994M | +$173M+$1.11B | +$193M+$1.81B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | REVS SCHV | +10.96%+11.26% | +15.96%+15.53% | +13.35%+12.86% | +15.12%+14.51% |
| Max drawdown | REVS SCHV | -4.35%-4.97% | -12.32%-11.95% | -16.16%-15.13% | -17.78%-19.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | REVS SCHV | 30d14d | 46d51d | 211d208d | 448d752d |
REVS | SCHV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.38 | $30.69 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.45 | $30.64 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
REVS | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
REVS | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.38 | $30.69 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | +0.16% |
| AuM | $213.52 M | $14.87 B |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.04% |
REVS | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 281 | 520 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the REVS and SCHV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, REVS is up 1.84% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHV has returned 3.49%. That puts SCHV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: REVS or SCHV?
Year-to-date, the REVS ETF saw +$74M in flows, compared to +$156M for SCHV.
Which ETF is more volatile: REVS or SCHV?
Over the past year, REVS had a volatility of 15.96%, while SCHV experienced 15.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: REVS or SCHV?
As of March 11, 2026, REVS holds $213.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHV manages $14.87 B.
What sectors do the REVS and SCHV ETFs invest in?
REVS leans toward sectors like Financials, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCHV focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the REVS ETF and SCHV ETF?
REVS top holdings include WELLS FARGO, PROCTERGAMBLE and EXXON. SCHV holds in its top three: BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: REVS or SCHV?
REVS holds 285 securities with 35.3% of its assets in the top 15. SCHV has 553 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.14%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
