REMXvsMOOETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. REMX's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. REMX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.56% for MOO. REMX is up 4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$733M in YTD flows. MOO performs better with 20.51% YTD performance, and +$458M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of REMX and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
REMX vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REMX MOO | -2.54%+7.43% | -13.31%+12.67% | +4.00%+20.51% | +26.98%+20.16% | +13.64%+17.25% | -24.53%+6.54% |
| Flows | REMX MOO | -$15M+$111M | -$134M+$139M | +$733M+$458M | +$1.42B+$422M | +$1.67B+$89M | +$1.53B+$279M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | REMX MOO | +39.83%+13.28% | +42.51%+13.66% | +35.80%+14.67% | +35.65%+16.51% |
| Max drawdown | REMX MOO | -33.32%-3.05% | -40.08%-10.98% | -52.90%-22.31% | -72.86%-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | REMX MOO | 78d23d | 125d193d | 749d852d | 1618d1602d |
Trading data
REMX | MOO | |
Last sale 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM | $76.73 | $87.58 |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $75.66 | $87.83 |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
REMX | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
REMX | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $76.73 | $87.58 |
| 1D performance | +1.41% | -0.28% |
| AuM | $2.24 B | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.56% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
REMX
China
31.86%
Australia
24.73%
USA
22.48%
Other
20.93%
MOO
USA
51.57%
Germany
9.81%
Norway
7.29%
Other
31.34%
Sectors
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
95.84%
Other
4.16%
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.03%
Non-Energy Materi.
29.09%
Industrials
20.65%
Healthcare
16.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.11%
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
REMX
Albemarle Corp.
8.09%
PLS Group Ltd.
7.56%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
7.50%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
6.84%
MP Materials Corp.
5.91%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
5.83%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
5.67%
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
5.04%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
4.34%
Lianyou Metals Co., Ltd.
4.25%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.91%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
3.81%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.67%
Liontown Ltd.
3.03%
AMG Critical Materials NV
2.66%
MOO
Corteva, Inc.
8.92%
Bayer AG
8.89%
Deere & Co.
7.95%
Nutrien Ltd.
6.57%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.21%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.07%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.81%
Kubota Corp.
4.77%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
4.37%
Bunge Global SA
3.14%
Mowi ASA
3.01%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.58%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.57%
Yara International ASA
2.39%
CNH Industrial NV
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about REMX and MOO
How have the REMX and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, REMX is up 4% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 20.51%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: REMX or MOO?
Year-to-date, the REMX ETF saw +$733M in flows, compared to +$458M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: REMX or MOO?
Over the past year, REMX had a volatility of 42.51%, while MOO experienced 13.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: REMX or MOO?
As of September 8, 2026, REMX holds $2.24 B in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $1.17 B.
What sectors do the REMX and MOO ETFs invest in?
REMX leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the REMX ETF and MOO ETF?
REMX top holdings include Albemarle Corp., PLS Group Ltd. and China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.. MOO holds in its top three: Corteva, Inc., Bayer AG and Deere & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: REMX or MOO?
REMX holds 29 securities with 78.11% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.49%.
Advertisement
Latest news about REMX & MOO
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Advertisement
