REMXvsCGWETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. REMX's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. REMX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.59% for CGW. REMX is up 3.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$733M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 1.98% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of REMX and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
REMX vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REMX CGW | -3.32%-2.69% | -14.33%+2.26% | +3.17%+1.98% | +29.25%+3.23% | +11.29%+37.69% | -26.07%+16.93% |
| Flows | REMX CGW | -$15M- | -$134M+$15M | +$733M+$41M | +$1.42B+$26M | +$1.67B-$148M | +$1.53B-$181M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | REMX CGW | +39.83%+13.26% | +42.43%+13.01% | +35.80%+13.79% | +35.65%+15.77% |
| Max drawdown | REMX CGW | -33.32%-4.04% | -40.08%-10.52% | -52.90%-14.42% | -72.86%-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | REMX CGW | 79d35d | 126d195d | 749d227d | 1619d862d |
Trading data
REMX | CGW | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $76.34 | $64.09 |
| Previous close 09/09/2026 | $76.73 | $64.57 |
| Consolidated volume 09/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
REMX | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
REMX | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $76.34 | $64.09 |
| 1D performance | -0.51% | -0.74% |
| AuM | $2.23 B | $1.04 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.59% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
REMX
China
31.86%
Australia
24.73%
USA
22.48%
Other
20.93%
CGW
USA
57.49%
United Kingdom
14.01%
Brazil
10.44%
Other
18.06%
Sectors
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
95.84%
Other
4.16%
CGW
Utilities
45.55%
Industrials
35.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.23%
Other
3.27%
Advertisement
Diversification
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.11%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68.16%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
REMX
Albemarle Corp.
8.09%
PLS Group Ltd.
7.56%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
7.50%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
6.84%
MP Materials Corp.
5.91%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
5.83%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
5.67%
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
5.04%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
4.34%
Lianyou Metals Co., Ltd.
4.25%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.91%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
3.81%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.67%
Liontown Ltd.
3.03%
AMG Critical Materials NV
2.66%
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.35%
Xylem, Inc.
8.21%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.29%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.88%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.49%
Severn Trent Plc
4.99%
Veralto Corp.
4.83%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.13%
Geberit AG
3.43%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.36%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.13%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.60%
American States Water Co.
2.34%
California Water Service Group
2.10%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.03%
Frequently asked questions about REMX and CGW
How have the REMX and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 9, 2026, REMX is up 3.17% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 1.98%. That puts REMX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: REMX or CGW?
Year-to-date, the REMX ETF saw +$733M in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: REMX or CGW?
Over the past year, REMX had a volatility of 42.43%, while CGW experienced 13.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: REMX or CGW?
As of September 9, 2026, REMX holds $2.23 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.04 B.
What sectors do the REMX and CGW ETFs invest in?
REMX leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the REMX ETF and CGW ETF?
REMX top holdings include Albemarle Corp., PLS Group Ltd. and China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.
Which ETF is more diversified: REMX or CGW?
REMX holds 29 securities with 78.11% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.16%.
Advertisement
Latest news about REMX & CGW
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
January 1, 1970
CGW
Advertisement
