Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RECSvsSPTMETF Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. RECS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.03% for SPTM. RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$282M in YTD flows. SPTM performs worse with -2.02% YTD performance, and +$107M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and SPTM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RECS vs SPTM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS SPTM | -2.94%-2.47% | -2.73%-1.86% | -1.84%-2.02% | +22.98%+20.35% | +82.47%+77.04% | +95.09%+76.93% |
| Flows | RECS SPTM | +$174M+$246M | +$487M+$467M | +$282M+$107M | +$2.28B+$833M | +$4.23B+$1.98B | +$4.20B+$3.16B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS SPTM | +11.63%+11.78% | +17.97%+18.28% | +14.48%+14.87% | +16.55%+16.88% |
| Max drawdown | RECS SPTM | -3.61%-4.30% | -13.84%-13.79% | -18.49%-18.88% | -22.06%-24.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS SPTM | 30d31d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 573d707d |
RECS | SPTM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 3:13 PM | $39.51 | $80.85 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $39.47 | $80.81 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RECS | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RECS | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.51 | $80.85 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | +0.05% |
| AuM | $4.95 B | $11.88 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.03% |
RECS | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | S&P Composite 1500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 331 | 1418 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | October 4, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RECS and SPTM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD), while SPTM has lost -2.02%. That puts RECS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or SPTM?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$282M in flows, compared to +$107M for SPTM.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or SPTM?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 17.97%, while SPTM experienced 18.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or SPTM?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS holds $4.95 B in assets under management (AUM), while SPTM manages $11.88 B.
What sectors do the RECS and SPTM ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SPTM focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and SPTM ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. SPTM holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or SPTM?
RECS holds 336 securities with 45.28% of its assets in the top 15. SPTM has 1504 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.58%.
How to avoid the capital gains mutual funds distribute even in down markets
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
