RECSvsQDFETF Comparison
VS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund ETF (QDF) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. RECS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.4% for QDF. RECS is up 8.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$701M in YTD flows. QDF performs better with 13.05% YTD performance, and -$53M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and QDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RECS vs QDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS QDF | +3.23%+1.37% | +5.07%+6.84% | +8.23%+13.05% | +17.54%+21.90% | +71.97%+61.04% | +86.74%+76.43% |
| Flows | RECS QDF | +$56M-$4M | +$206M-$31M | +$701M-$53M | +$2.01B-$45M | +$4.50B-$221M | +$4.70B-$233M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS QDF | +10.73%+11.96% | +12.05%+12.15% | +14.57%+14.29% | +16.57%+15.80% |
| Max drawdown | RECS QDF | -3.45%-3.59% | -8.79%-7.83% | -18.49%-18.14% | -22.06%-22.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS QDF | 34d10d | 66d50d | 126d128d | 573d560d |
Trading data
RECS | QDF | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.52 | $91.35 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $44.16 | $90.75 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RECS | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RECS | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.52 | $91.35 |
| 1D performance | +0.82% | +0.66% |
| AuM | $5.92 B | $2.22 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
RECS | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index |
| N° of holdings | 444 | 114 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | December 14, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RECS
USA
98.76%
Other
1.24%
QDF
USA
96.7%
Other
3.3%
Sectors
RECS
Technology
43.15%
Finance
13.39%
Industrials
8.19%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.07%
Healthcare
7.88%
Other
19.31%
QDF
Technology
41.2%
Finance
19.74%
Industrials
10.47%
Healthcare
9.08%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.41%
Other
12.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.71%
QDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
11.49%
Apple, Inc.
10.88%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.44%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.82%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.23%
Bank of America Corp.
1.94%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.56%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.33%
Chevron Corp.
1.29%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.21%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.15%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.13%
Lam Research Corp.
1.10%
CVS Health Corp.
1.09%
Starbucks Corp.
1.05%
QDF
Apple, Inc.
7.94%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.18%
Broadcom Inc.
3.86%
Lam Research Corp.
3.62%
Microsoft Corp.
3.16%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.99%
Johnson & Johnson
2.85%
GE Aerospace
2.73%
KLA Corp.
2.52%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.40%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.39%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.36%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.93%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.83%
Frequently asked questions about RECS and QDF
How have the RECS and QDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, RECS is up 8.23% year-to-date (YTD), while QDF has returned 13.05%. That puts QDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or QDF?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$701M in flows, compared to -$53M for QDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or QDF?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 12.05%, while QDF experienced 12.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or QDF?
As of July 24, 2026, RECS holds $5.92 B in assets under management (AUM), while QDF manages $2.22 B.
What sectors do the RECS and QDF ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, QDF focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and QDF ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. QDF holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or QDF?
RECS holds 454 securities with 45.71% of its assets in the top 15. QDF has 115 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.77%.
Advertisement
Latest news about RECS & QDF
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
QDF
Advertisement
Advertisement
