Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RCTRvsURAETF Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. RCTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.69% for URA. RCTR is up 12.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. URA performs better with 19.96% YTD performance, and +$826M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RCTR vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR URA | -0.94%-3.64% | +8.11%+10.56% | +12.15%+19.96% | n/a+129.37% | n/a+197.31% | n/a+246.29% |
| Flows | RCTR URA | -+$155M | +$5M+$1.12B | +$5M+$826M | -+$1.46B | -+$2.82B | -+$4.06B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR URA | +25.45%+48.48% | n/a+42.52% | n/a+34.09% | n/a+36.57% |
| Max drawdown | RCTR URA | -7.92%-19.14% | n/a-28.67% | n/a-36.76% | n/a-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR URA | 22d42d | n/a97d | n/a214d | n/a738d |
RCTR | URA | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.12 | $50.77 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $36.50 | $51.36 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RCTR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RCTR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.12 | $50.77 |
| 1D performance | -1.05% | -1.15% |
| AuM | $21.81 M | $7.14 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.69% |
RCTR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Global X |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | Solactive Global Uranium Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 42 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | November 4, 2010 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RCTR and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RCTR is up 12.15% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has returned 19.96%. That puts URA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or URA?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$826M for URA.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or URA?
As of March 11, 2026, RCTR holds $21.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $7.14 B.
What sectors do the RCTR and URA ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and URA ETF?
RCTR top holdings include CAMECO, DOOSAN ENERBILITY and MITSUBISHI HVY. URA holds in its top three: CAMECO, ALTC ACQUISITION and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or URA?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 64.25% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 48 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.92%.
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
