RCTRvsURAETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. RCTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.69% for URA. RCTR is down -0.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with -9.24% YTD performance, and +$821M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RCTR vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR URA | -7.66%-18.53% | -14.37%-29.90% | -0.29%-9.24% | n/a+0.98% | n/a+102.98% | n/a+150.90% |
| Flows | RCTR URA | +$5M-$4M | +$7M+$29M | +$12M+$821M | -+$1.84B | -+$2.81B | -+$3.86B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR URA | +25.29%+44.39% | n/a+44.61% | n/a+36.23% | n/a+37.44% |
| Max drawdown | RCTR URA | -16.66%-32.36% | n/a-36.23% | n/a-36.76% | n/a-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR URA | 71d72d | n/a170d | n/a214d | n/a738d |
Trading data
RCTR | URA | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.03 | $38.73 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $32.14 | $39.11 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RCTR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RCTR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.03 | $38.73 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.97% |
| AuM | $25.78 M | $5.38 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.69% |
Characteristics
RCTR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Global X |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | Solactive Global Uranium Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 49 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | November 4, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RCTR
USA
45.97%
Japan
11.94%
Canada
7.87%
Republic of Korea
7.41%
China
7.11%
Other
19.7%
URA
Canada
40.26%
USA
23.65%
Republic of Korea
14.42%
Australia
9.2%
Other
12.46%
Sectors
RCTR
Utilities
40.26%
Industrials
38.77%
Energy
10.73%
Other
10.24%
URA
Energy
53.73%
Industrials
24.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.77%
Utilities
7.37%
Other
6.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
RCTR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
66.22%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.96%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
RCTR
BHP Group Ltd.
5.69%
Talen Energy Corp.
5.18%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
5.00%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
4.90%
Hitachi Ltd.
4.79%
GE Vernova, Inc.
4.76%
Vistra Corp.
4.61%
Cameco Corp.
4.51%
Constellation Energy Corp.
4.38%
Entergy Corp.
4.11%
The Southern Co.
4.11%
Duke Energy Corp.
4.08%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
3.94%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
3.39%
CEZ as
2.77%
URA
Cameco Corp.
23.18%
Oklo, Inc.
7.37%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.32%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.86%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.47%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.33%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.92%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.32%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
3.27%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.05%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.97%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.87%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.83%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.81%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.38%
Frequently asked questions about RCTR and URA
How have the RCTR and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 16, 2026, RCTR is down -0.29% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has lost -9.24%. That puts RCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or URA?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to +$821M for URA.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or URA?
As of July 16, 2026, RCTR holds $25.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $5.38 B.
What sectors do the RCTR and URA ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and URA ETF?
RCTR top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Talen Energy Corp. and Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.. URA holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or URA?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 66.22% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.96%.
Advertisement
Latest news about RCTR & URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
URA
Advertisement
