RCTRvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. RCTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.56% for NLR. RCTR is up 17.8% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with 14.77% YTD performance, and +$937M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RCTR vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR NLR | +11.15%+11.01% | +3.83%-12.51% | +17.80%+14.77% | n/a+84.12% | n/a+171.36% | n/a+199.80% |
| Flows | RCTR NLR | -$5K+$139M | +$4M+$651M | +$5M+$937M | -+$3.01B | -+$4.06B | -+$4.09B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR NLR | +27.42%+40.06% | n/a+36.73% | n/a+30.25% | n/a+25.74% |
| Max drawdown | RCTR NLR | -12.02%-21.18% | n/a-25.64% | n/a-29.79% | n/a-29.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR NLR | 56d90d | n/a104d | n/a116d | n/a116d |
Trading data
RCTR | NLR | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.66 | $137.56 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $37.34 | $141.09 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.66 | $137.56 |
| 1D performance | -1.82% | -2.50% |
| AuM | $22.89 M | $5.05 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 22 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RCTR
USA
44.52%
Japan
13.46%
Canada
9.19%
Republic of Korea
8.18%
Other
24.65%
NLR
USA
48.48%
Canada
21.11%
Other
30.4%
Sectors
RCTR
Industrials
35.26%
Utilities
32.96%
Energy
12.61%
Other
19.17%
NLR
Energy
36.75%
Utilities
35.57%
Industrials
15.84%
Other
11.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
RCTR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
66.73%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
RCTR
US36828A1016
5.57%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY
5.40%
ENTERGY
5.12%
BHP GROUP LTD
5.03%
MITSUBISHI HVY
5.00%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
4.96%
CAMECO
4.77%
DUKE ENERGY
4.72%
SOUTHERN
4.71%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS
4.21%
HITACHI
4.03%
VISTRA CORP
3.94%
US87422Q1094
3.50%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
3.23%
CEZ
2.54%
NLR
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
8.73%
CAMECO
7.83%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
6.45%
PUBLIC SRVCE ENT
6.33%
PG&E
5.73%
FORTUM
5.27%
CGN POWER CO LTD
5.07%
US63253R2013
4.74%
CEZ
4.44%
URANIUM ENERGY
4.37%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
4.24%
PALADIN ENERGY
4.23%
DENISON MINES
4.08%
ENERGY FUELS
4.05%
NUSCALE POWER CORPORATION
3.63%
Frequently asked questions about RCTR and NLR
How have the RCTR and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, RCTR is up 17.8% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has returned 14.77%. That puts RCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or NLR?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$937M for NLR.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or NLR?
As of April 27, 2026, RCTR holds $22.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $5.05 B.
What sectors do the RCTR and NLR ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and NLR ETF?
RCTR top holdings include US36828A1016, DOOSAN ENERBILITY and ENTERGY. NLR holds in its top three: CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP, CAMECO and BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or NLR?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 66.73% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.2%.
Advertisement
Latest news about RCTR & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
