RCTRvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. RCTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.52% for NLR. RCTR is down -0.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -15.04% YTD performance, and +$1.01B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RCTR vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR NLR | -7.66%-15.92% | -14.37%-27.62% | -0.29%-15.04% | n/a-5.34% | n/a+88.05% | n/a+124.97% |
| Flows | RCTR NLR | +$5M-$71M | +$7M+$149M | +$12M+$1.01B | -+$2.68B | -+$4.13B | -+$4.16B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR NLR | +25.29%+38.20% | n/a+37.87% | n/a+31.60% | n/a+26.85% |
| Max drawdown | RCTR NLR | -16.66%-29.00% | n/a-35.23% | n/a-35.23% | n/a-35.23% |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR NLR | 71d71d | n/a169d | n/a169d | n/a169d |
Trading data
RCTR | NLR | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.03 | $104.20 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $32.14 | $104.67 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.03 | $104.20 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.45% |
| AuM | $25.78 M | $3.78 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.52% |
Characteristics
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RCTR
USA
45.97%
Japan
11.94%
Canada
7.87%
Republic of Korea
7.41%
China
7.11%
Other
19.7%
NLR
USA
50%
Canada
17.05%
Australia
7.25%
Other
25.71%
Sectors
RCTR
Utilities
40.26%
Industrials
38.77%
Energy
10.73%
Other
10.24%
NLR
Utilities
37.99%
Energy
36.32%
Industrials
21.87%
Other
3.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
RCTR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
66.22%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
RCTR
BHP Group Ltd.
5.69%
Talen Energy Corp.
5.18%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
5.00%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
4.90%
Hitachi Ltd.
4.79%
GE Vernova, Inc.
4.76%
Vistra Corp.
4.61%
Cameco Corp.
4.51%
Constellation Energy Corp.
4.38%
Entergy Corp.
4.11%
The Southern Co.
4.11%
Duke Energy Corp.
4.08%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
3.94%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
3.39%
CEZ as
2.77%
NLR
Cameco Corp.
8.12%
Constellation Energy Corp.
8.07%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.46%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
5.94%
Oklo, Inc.
5.17%
PG&E Corp.
5.15%
Fortum Oyj
4.81%
CEZ as
4.70%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.56%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.41%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.38%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.32%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
4.26%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.17%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.14%
Frequently asked questions about RCTR and NLR
How have the RCTR and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 16, 2026, RCTR is down -0.29% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -15.04%. That puts RCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or NLR?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to +$1.01B for NLR.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or NLR?
As of July 16, 2026, RCTR holds $25.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $3.78 B.
What sectors do the RCTR and NLR ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Utilities, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and NLR ETF?
RCTR top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Talen Energy Corp. and Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.. NLR holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Constellation Energy Corp. and BWX Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or NLR?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 66.22% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.67%.
Advertisement
Latest news about RCTR & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
