RCTRvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. RCTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.52% for NLR. RCTR is up 3.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -5.37% YTD performance, and +$902M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RCTR vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR NLR | +0.39%+5.33% | -6.24%-14.52% | +3.22%-5.37% | +11.85%+1.37% | n/a+92.41% | n/a+139.00% |
| Flows | RCTR NLR | +$3M-$61M | +$9M-$183M | +$16M+$902M | +$28M+$2.17B | -+$4.00B | -+$4.05B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR NLR | +23.66%+38.76% | +24.23%+38.98% | n/a+32.46% | n/a+27.52% |
| Max drawdown | RCTR NLR | -11.88%-24.96% | -18.92%-36.67% | n/a-36.67% | n/a-36.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR NLR | 92d92d | 119d217d | n/a217d | n/a217d |
Trading data
RCTR | NLR | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.13 | $119.19 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $33.57 | $117.03 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.13 | $119.19 |
| 1D performance | +1.66% | +1.85% |
| AuM | $30.03 M | $4.09 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.52% |
Characteristics
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RCTR
USA
44.46%
Japan
14.78%
Canada
7.9%
Other
32.86%
NLR
USA
51.08%
Canada
18.8%
Australia
7.41%
Other
22.71%
Sectors
RCTR
Utilities
40.87%
Industrials
39.07%
Energy
10.49%
Other
9.57%
NLR
Energy
39.26%
Utilities
31.2%
Industrials
23.85%
Other
5.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
RCTR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.54%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
83.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
RCTR
Hitachi Ltd.
5.20%
Constellation Energy Corp.
5.17%
BHP Group Ltd.
5.05%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
4.88%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
4.56%
Cameco Corp.
4.40%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
4.34%
Duke Energy Corp.
4.29%
Entergy Corp.
4.23%
The Southern Co.
4.23%
Vistra Corp.
4.17%
Talen Energy Corp.
3.94%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.93%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
3.71%
CEZ as
3.44%
NLR
Constellation Energy Corp.
9.13%
Cameco Corp.
7.79%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
7.24%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.17%
Fortum Oyj
5.91%
Centrus Energy Corp.
5.69%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.27%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.88%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.87%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.61%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.53%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.45%
Oklo, Inc.
4.39%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.37%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.04%
Frequently asked questions about RCTR and NLR
How have the RCTR and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, RCTR is up 3.22% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -5.37%. That puts RCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or NLR?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to +$902M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: RCTR or NLR?
Over the past year, RCTR had a volatility of 24.23%, while NLR experienced 38.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or NLR?
As of September 2, 2026, RCTR holds $30.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $4.09 B.
What sectors do the RCTR and NLR ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and NLR ETF?
RCTR top holdings include Hitachi Ltd., Constellation Energy Corp. and BHP Group Ltd.. NLR holds in its top three: Constellation Energy Corp., Cameco Corp. and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or NLR?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 65.54% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 83.33%.
Advertisement
Latest news about RCTR & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
