Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RCTRvsNLRETF Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. RCTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.56% for NLR. RCTR is up 12.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. NLR performs better with 14.26% YTD performance, and +$687M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RCTR vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR NLR | -0.94%-3.08% | +8.11%+5.28% | +12.15%+14.26% | n/a+93.04% | n/a+184.14% | n/a+213.22% |
| Flows | RCTR NLR | -+$199M | +$5M+$843M | +$5M+$687M | -+$2.69B | -+$3.81B | -+$3.84B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR NLR | +25.45%+41.80% | n/a+37.32% | n/a+29.49% | n/a+25.15% |
| Max drawdown | RCTR NLR | -7.92%-16.12% | n/a-25.64% | n/a-29.79% | n/a-29.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR NLR | 22d42d | n/a104d | n/a116d | n/a116d |
RCTR | NLR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.12 | $140.81 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $36.50 | $141.12 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.12 | $140.81 |
| 1D performance | -1.05% | -0.22% |
| AuM | $21.81 M | $4.77 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.56% |
RCTR | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 23 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RCTR and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RCTR is up 12.15% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has returned 14.26%. That puts NLR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or NLR?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$687M for NLR.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or NLR?
As of March 11, 2026, RCTR holds $21.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $4.77 B.
What sectors do the RCTR and NLR ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and NLR ETF?
RCTR top holdings include CAMECO, DOOSAN ENERBILITY and MITSUBISHI HVY. NLR holds in its top three: CAMECO, DENISON MINES and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or NLR?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 64.25% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.88%.
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
