QTUMvsCHPSETF Comparison
VS
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) belongs to the Disruptive Technology segment. Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. QTUM's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Telecommunications. In contrast, CHPS's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials QTUM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.15% for CHPS. QTUM is up 27.99% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.16B in YTD flows. CHPS performs better with 78.28% YTD performance, and +$64M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QTUM and CHPS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QTUM vs CHPS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QTUM CHPS | -12.77%-13.94% | +5.58%+15.97% | +27.99%+78.28% | +50.46%+140.96% | +180.43%+247.51% | +200.42%n/a |
| Flows | QTUM CHPS | -$140M+$3M | +$828M+$33M | +$1.16B+$64M | +$2.17B+$71M | +$3.50B+$72M | +$3.56B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QTUM CHPS | +37.90%+54.82% | +28.04%+37.02% | +25.65%+31.26% | +25.23%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QTUM CHPS | -16.86%-21.74% | -16.86%-21.74% | -24.76%-38.38% | -38.00%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QTUM CHPS | 32d32d | 32d32d | 153d429d | 797dn/a |
Trading data
QTUM | CHPS | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $139.56 | $82.81 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $143.47 | $87.10 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QTUM | CHPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QTUM | CHPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $139.56 | $82.81 |
| 1D performance | -2.73% | -4.93% |
| AuM | $5.17 B | $104.99 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
QTUM | CHPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Defiance ETFs | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index | Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index |
| N° of holdings | 80 | 55 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 4, 2018 | July 13, 2023 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QTUM
USA
53.84%
Japan
7.95%
Netherlands
7.02%
Other
31.19%
CHPS
USA
60.69%
Taiwan
10.25%
Republic of Korea
8.21%
Japan
7.87%
Other
12.98%
Sectors
QTUM
Technology
75.59%
Industrials
7.93%
Other
16.48%
CHPS
Technology
99.5%
Other
0.5%
Advertisement
Diversification
QTUM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.97%
CHPS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.19%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QTUM
Arqit Quantum, Inc.
2.08%
SGXZ31642911
2.07%
US74768A1043
1.53%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.43%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.42%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.41%
BTQ Technologies Corp.
1.38%
MKS, Inc.
1.38%
Onto Innovation, Inc.
1.35%
Intel Corp.
1.35%
Astera Labs, Inc.
1.33%
Lam Research Corp.
1.32%
KLA Corp.
1.31%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.31%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.30%
CHPS
Micron Technology, Inc.
6.98%
SK hynix, Inc.
6.97%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
6.16%
Intel Corp.
5.96%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
4.26%
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.15%
Lam Research Corp.
4.06%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.95%
KLA Corp.
3.90%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
3.70%
MediaTek, Inc.
3.48%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
3.48%
ASML Holding NV
3.42%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
3.42%
Analog Devices, Inc.
3.30%
Frequently asked questions about QTUM and CHPS
How have the QTUM and CHPS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, QTUM is up 27.99% year-to-date (YTD), while CHPS has returned 78.28%. That puts CHPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QTUM or CHPS?
Year-to-date, the QTUM ETF saw +$1.16B in flows, compared to +$64M for CHPS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QTUM or CHPS?
Over the past year, QTUM had a volatility of 28.04%, while CHPS experienced 37.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: QTUM or CHPS?
As of July 24, 2026, QTUM holds $5.17 B in assets under management (AUM), while CHPS manages $104.99 M.
What sectors do the QTUM and CHPS ETFs invest in?
QTUM leans toward sectors like Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CHPS focuses on Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QTUM ETF and CHPS ETF?
QTUM top holdings include Arqit Quantum, Inc., SGXZ31642911 and US74768A1043. CHPS holds in its top three: Micron Technology, Inc., SK hynix, Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QTUM or CHPS?
QTUM holds 82 securities with 21.97% of its assets in the top 15. CHPS has 58 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.19%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QTUM & CHPS
Ask the Manager: Dr. Maria Milina on Artificial Intelligence and What to expect in 2026
March 10, 2026
CHPS
Quantum Computing Inches Forward: What ETF Investors Should Watch
June 12, 2025
QTUM
There’s an ETF for that? Quantum Computing
March 14, 2025
QTUM
Advertisement
Advertisement
