Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QQQIvsQCLRETF Comparison
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QQQI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.68%, versus 0.25% for QCLR. QQQI is down -1.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.97B in YTD flows. QCLR performs worse with -3.03% YTD performance, and +$860K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QQQI and QCLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QQQI vs QCLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQI QCLR | -0.09%-1.48% | -1.13%-2.94% | -1.64%-3.03% | +22.47%+13.55% | n/a+56.51% | n/an/a |
| Flows | QQQI QCLR | +$755M- | +$2.62B+$860K | +$1.97B+$860K | +$8.15B+$2M | -+$829K | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QQQI QCLR | +13.91%+11.24% | +19.77%+11.64% | n/a+11.90% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QQQI QCLR | -4.52%-5.02% | -14.69%-6.50% | n/a-13.20% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QQQI QCLR | 43d43d | 45d45d | n/a127d | n/an/a |
QQQI | QCLR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 4:57 PM | $51.53 | $27.47 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $51.74 | $27.53 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QQQI | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QQQI | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.53 | $27.47 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $9.05 B | $3.86 M |
| E/R | 0.68% | 0.25% |
QQQI | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 30, 2024 | August 25, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QQQI and QCLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, QQQI is down -1.64% year-to-date (YTD), while QCLR has lost -3.03%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QQQI or QCLR?
Year-to-date, the QQQI ETF saw +$1.97B in flows, compared to +$860K for QCLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: QQQI or QCLR?
Over the past year, QQQI had a volatility of 19.77%, while QCLR experienced 11.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: QQQI or QCLR?
As of March 12, 2026, QQQI holds $9.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while QCLR manages $3.86 M.
What sectors do the QQQI and QCLR ETFs invest in?
QQQI leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QCLR focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QQQI ETF and QCLR ETF?
QQQI top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QCLR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QQQI or QCLR?
QQQI holds 100 securities with 59.61% of its assets in the top 15. QCLR has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.08%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
