Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QQQIvsPTNQETF Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QQQI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.68%, versus 0.65% for PTNQ. QQQI is down -0.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.89B in YTD flows. PTNQ performs worse with -1.22% YTD performance, and -$36M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QQQI and PTNQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QQQI vs PTNQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQI PTNQ | -0.32%-0.65% | -1.44%-3.24% | -0.27%-1.22% | +25.25%+10.18% | n/a+64.40% | n/a+57.79% |
| Flows | QQQI PTNQ | +$791M-$12M | +$2.65B-$24M | +$1.89B-$36M | +$8.08B-$154M | -+$123M | -+$43M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QQQI PTNQ | +13.92%+16.06% | +19.74%+14.63% | n/a+12.40% | n/a+12.57% |
| Max drawdown | QQQI PTNQ | -4.52%-5.67% | -14.69%-9.84% | n/a-14.19% | n/a-18.23% |
| Max drawdown duration | QQQI PTNQ | 41d41d | 45d120d | n/a210d | n/a550d |
QQQI | PTNQ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.50 | $77.75 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $52.44 | $77.67 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QQQI | PTNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QQQI | PTNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.50 | $77.75 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | +0.10% |
| AuM | $9.09 B | $1.23 B |
| E/R | 0.68% | 0.65% |
QQQI | PTNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 30, 2024 | June 11, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QQQI and PTNQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QQQI is down -0.27% year-to-date (YTD), while PTNQ has lost -1.22%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QQQI or PTNQ?
Year-to-date, the QQQI ETF saw +$1.89B in flows, compared to -$36M for PTNQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: QQQI or PTNQ?
Over the past year, QQQI had a volatility of 19.74%, while PTNQ experienced 14.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: QQQI or PTNQ?
As of March 10, 2026, QQQI holds $9.09 B in assets under management (AUM), while PTNQ manages $1.23 B.
What sectors do the QQQI and PTNQ ETFs invest in?
QQQI leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, PTNQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QQQI ETF and PTNQ ETF?
QQQI top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. PTNQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QQQI or PTNQ?
QQQI holds 100 securities with 59.61% of its assets in the top 15. PTNQ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.45%.
ETF Comparison: JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) Versus NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI)
Multi-Asset Class ETFs – minimize the stress of asset allocation
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
