Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QQHvsQQQIETF Comparison
HCM Defender 100 ETF (QQH) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QQH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.98%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. QQH is down -2.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with -0.16% YTD performance, and +$1.91B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QQH and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QQH vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQH QQQI | -0.96%-0.47% | -5.48%-1.15% | -2.90%-0.16% | +25.65%+25.71% | +110.01%n/a | +88.64%n/a |
| Flows | QQH QQQI | -+$798M | +$39M+$2.61B | +$16M+$1.91B | +$24M+$8.10B | +$133M- | +$297M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QQH QQQI | +21.77%+13.92% | +22.75%+19.74% | +21.89%n/a | +22.11%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QQH QQQI | -7.92%-4.52% | -13.04%-14.69% | -24.86%n/a | -41.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QQH QQQI | 41d42d | 49d45d | 238dn/a | 878dn/a |
QQH | QQQI | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.41 | $51.74 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $75.08 | $52.50 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QQH | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QQH | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.41 | $51.74 |
| 1D performance | -2.23% | -1.45% |
| AuM | $675.81 M | $9.12 B |
| E/R | 0.98% | 0.68% |
QQH | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Howard Capital Management | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | HCM Defender 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 84 | 93 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 10, 2019 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QQH and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QQH is down -2.9% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has lost -0.16%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QQH or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the QQH ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to +$1.91B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: QQH or QQQI?
Over the past year, QQH had a volatility of 22.75%, while QQQI experienced 19.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: QQH or QQQI?
As of March 10, 2026, QQH holds $675.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $9.12 B.
What sectors do the QQH and QQQI ETFs invest in?
QQH leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QQQI focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QQH ETF and QQQI ETF?
QQH top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QQQI holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QQH or QQQI?
QQH holds 88 securities with 58.27% of its assets in the top 15. QQQI has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.61%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
