Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QQHvsIVWETF Comparison
HCM Defender 100 ETF (QQH) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QQH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.98%, versus 0.18% for IVW. QQH is down -2.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. IVW performs better with -2.74% YTD performance, and -$326M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QQH and IVW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QQH vs IVW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQH IVW | -1.75%-1.64% | -5.14%-3.66% | -2.91%-2.74% | +25.63%+29.57% | +106.88%+105.87% | +87.82%+95.91% |
| Flows | QQH IVW | -+$198M | +$39M-$398M | +$16M-$326M | +$24M-$1.59B | +$133M+$5.55B | +$297M+$4.55B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QQH IVW | +21.79%+16.39% | +22.80%+22.33% | +21.91%+18.63% | +22.12%+21.12% |
| Max drawdown | QQH IVW | -7.92%-6.09% | -13.04%-15.10% | -24.86%-22.23% | -41.41%-32.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | QQH IVW | 40d41d | 49d45d | 238d124d | 878d794d |
QQH | IVW | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.08 | $119.93 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $75.04 | $119.87 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QQH | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QQH | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.08 | $119.93 |
| 1D performance | +0.06% | +0.05% |
| AuM | $675.72 M | $64.43 B |
| E/R | 0.98% | 0.18% |
QQH | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Howard Capital Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | HCM Defender 100 Index | S&P 500 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 84 | 132 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 10, 2019 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QQH and IVW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, QQH is down -2.91% year-to-date (YTD), while IVW has lost -2.74%. That puts IVW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QQH or IVW?
Year-to-date, the QQH ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to -$326M for IVW.
Which ETF is more volatile: QQH or IVW?
Over the past year, QQH had a volatility of 22.8%, while IVW experienced 22.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: QQH or IVW?
As of March 9, 2026, QQH holds $675.72 M in assets under management (AUM), while IVW manages $64.43 B.
What sectors do the QQH and IVW ETFs invest in?
QQH leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IVW focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QQH ETF and IVW ETF?
QQH top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IVW holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: QQH or IVW?
QQH holds 88 securities with 58.27% of its assets in the top 15. IVW has 140 securities and a top 15 weight of 69.25%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
