QMIDvsBULETF Comparison
VS
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. QMID's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, BUL's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Consumer Services and Technology. QMID is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.6% for BUL. QMID is up 4.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$700K in YTD flows. BUL performs better with 13.3% YTD performance, and +$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMID and BUL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMID vs BUL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMID BUL | -4.02%-1.94% | +1.42%+4.94% | +4.26%+13.30% | +4.06%+17.65% | n/a+74.31% | n/a+62.32% |
| Flows | QMID BUL | -+$3M | -+$379K | +$700K+$9M | +$704K+$32M | -+$56M | -+$92M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMID BUL | +13.85%+15.17% | +14.95%+16.72% | n/a+19.43% | n/a+21.94% |
| Max drawdown | QMID BUL | -5.71%-5.05% | -10.70%-9.07% | n/a-23.19% | n/a-27.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | QMID BUL | 22d22d | 160d49d | n/a210d | n/a855d |
Trading data
QMID | BUL | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.38 | $62.71 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $29.40 | $62.42 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QMID | BUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QMID | BUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.38 | $62.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | +0.46% |
| AuM | $2.21 M | $137.38 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
QMID | BUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index | Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 124 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2024 | May 2, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
QMID
USA
94.26%
Other
5.74%
BUL
USA
92.74%
Other
7.26%
Sectors
QMID
Technology
18.26%
Healthcare
17.86%
Industrials
15.12%
Finance
13.85%
Consumer Services
11.51%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.24%
Other
16.15%
BUL
Healthcare
27.2%
Consumer Services
17.87%
Technology
13%
Industrials
11.1%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.01%
Other
15.08%
Advertisement
Diversification
QMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.13%
BUL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.54%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QMID
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.85%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.38%
Toast, Inc.
1.36%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
1.29%
Everest Group Ltd.
1.29%
DaVita, Inc.
1.27%
Permian Resources Corp.
1.25%
Atlassian Corp.
1.21%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.21%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.19%
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
1.19%
Somnigroup International, Inc.
1.18%
Nutanix, Inc.
1.16%
lululemon athletica, Inc.
1.16%
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
1.16%
BUL
Booking Holdings, Inc.
5.71%
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
5.07%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
4.99%
Newmont Corp.
4.56%
Expedia Group, Inc.
4.53%
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
4.15%
Tapestry, Inc.
3.94%
TechnipFMC plc
3.66%
VeriSign, Inc.
3.38%
Okta, Inc.
3.16%
Incyte Corp.
3.05%
First Solar, Inc.
2.90%
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
2.82%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
2.81%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.81%
Frequently asked questions about QMID and BUL
How have the QMID and BUL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, QMID is up 4.26% year-to-date (YTD), while BUL has returned 13.3%. That puts BUL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMID or BUL?
Year-to-date, the QMID ETF saw +$700K in flows, compared to +$9M for BUL.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMID or BUL?
Over the past year, QMID had a volatility of 14.95%, while BUL experienced 16.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMID or BUL?
As of September 15, 2026, QMID holds $2.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while BUL manages $137.38 M.
What sectors do the QMID and BUL ETFs invest in?
QMID leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, BUL focuses on Healthcare, Consumer Services and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QMID ETF and BUL ETF?
QMID top holdings include Tenet Healthcare Corp., Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Toast, Inc.. BUL holds in its top three: Booking Holdings, Inc., HCA Healthcare, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QMID or BUL?
QMID holds 124 securities with 19.13% of its assets in the top 15. BUL has 48 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.54%.
Latest news about QMID & BUL
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
BUL
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
April 28, 2023
BUL
Advertisement
Advertisement
