QMARvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
FT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. QMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. QMAR is up 16.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$78M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 16.08% YTD performance, and +$3.61B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMAR and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QMAR vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMAR GPIQ | -0.28%-2.30% | +3.95%+3.02% | +16.02%+16.08% | +18.24%+17.98% | +58.45%n/a | +71.60%n/a |
| Flows | QMAR GPIQ | +$15M+$617M | +$32M+$1.40B | +$78M+$3.61B | +$93M+$4.31B | +$226M- | +$388M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMAR GPIQ | +6.23%+15.75% | +6.94%+17.12% | +10.86%n/a | +13.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QMAR GPIQ | -2.28%-6.23% | -3.27%-9.57% | -15.76%n/a | -19.79%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QMAR GPIQ | 10d13d | 10d75d | 128dn/a | 416dn/a |
QMAR | GPIQ | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 7:59 PM | $38.29 | $56.40 |
| Previous close 10/20/2026 | $38.32 | $56.13 |
| Consolidated volume 10/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
QMAR | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.29 | $56.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $616.39 M | $6.37 B |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.35% |
QMAR | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2020 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
