Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QFLRvsONEQETF Comparison
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QFLR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.21% for ONEQ. QFLR is up 0.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$38M in YTD flows. ONEQ performs worse with -2.1% YTD performance, and -$105M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QFLR and ONEQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QFLR vs ONEQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QFLR ONEQ | -0.68%-1.46% | -0.78%-3.54% | +0.79%-2.10% | +26.80%+31.04% | n/a+107.92% | n/a+78.35% |
| Flows | QFLR ONEQ | +$2M-$77M | +$45M-$283M | +$38M-$105M | +$133M+$73M | -+$669M | -+$1.56B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QFLR ONEQ | +11.94%+15.60% | +12.77%+23.23% | n/a+19.71% | n/a+22.48% |
| Max drawdown | QFLR ONEQ | -3.74%-6.07% | -7.52%-16.44% | n/a-24.22% | n/a-34.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | QFLR ONEQ | 28d42d | 45d45d | n/a191d | n/a807d |
QFLR | ONEQ | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.00 | $87.89 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $34.51 | $89.45 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QFLR | ONEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QFLR | ONEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.00 | $87.89 |
| 1D performance | -1.48% | -1.74% |
| AuM | $475.78 M | $9.03 B |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QFLR and ONEQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QFLR is up 0.79% year-to-date (YTD), while ONEQ has lost -2.1%. That puts QFLR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QFLR or ONEQ?
Year-to-date, the QFLR ETF saw +$38M in flows, compared to -$105M for ONEQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: QFLR or ONEQ?
Over the past year, QFLR had a volatility of 12.77%, while ONEQ experienced 23.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: QFLR or ONEQ?
As of March 11, 2026, QFLR holds $475.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONEQ manages $9.03 B.
What sectors do the QFLR and ONEQ ETFs invest in?
QFLR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ONEQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QFLR ETF and ONEQ ETF?
QFLR top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ONEQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QFLR or ONEQ?
QFLR holds 44 securities with 66.79% of its assets in the top 15. ONEQ has 995 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.25%.
How Innovator's "Managed Floor" ETFs Can Fit Into a 40/30/30 Portfolio
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
