Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QFLRvsNBGXETF Comparison
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QFLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 2.83% for NBGX. QFLR is up 0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$38M in YTD flows. NBGX performs worse with -4.22% YTD performance, and +$683K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QFLR and NBGX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QFLR vs NBGX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QFLR NBGX | -0.53%-1.40% | -1.06%-4.97% | +0.69%-4.22% | +26.64%+20.29% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QFLR NBGX | +$4M- | +$45M+$1M | +$38M+$683K | +$133M+$2M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QFLR NBGX | +11.94%+13.71% | +12.77%+20.61% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QFLR NBGX | -3.92%-6.49% | -7.52%-14.35% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QFLR NBGX | 29d56d | 45d37d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
QFLR | NBGX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.51 | $26.72 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $34.52 | $26.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
QFLR | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.51 | $26.72 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $475.32 M | $13.41 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 2.83% |
QFLR | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 44 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2024 | December 18, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QFLR and NBGX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QFLR is up 0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while NBGX has lost -4.22%. That puts QFLR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QFLR or NBGX?
Year-to-date, the QFLR ETF saw +$38M in flows, compared to +$683K for NBGX.
Which ETF is more volatile: QFLR or NBGX?
Over the past year, QFLR had a volatility of 12.77%, while NBGX experienced 20.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: QFLR or NBGX?
As of March 10, 2026, QFLR holds $475.32 M in assets under management (AUM), while NBGX manages $13.41 M.
What sectors do the QFLR and NBGX ETFs invest in?
QFLR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, NBGX focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QFLR ETF and NBGX ETF?
QFLR top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. NBGX holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: QFLR or NBGX?
QFLR holds 44 securities with 66.79% of its assets in the top 15. NBGX has 45 securities and a top 15 weight of 69.76%.
How Innovator's "Managed Floor" ETFs Can Fit Into a 40/30/30 Portfolio
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
