Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QDPLvsPTLCETF Comparison
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. QDPL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Sovereign and Communication Services. In contrast, PTLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Both QDPL and PTLC have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%. QDPL is down -2.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$68M in YTD flows. PTLC performs worse with -2.99% YTD performance, and -$101M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDPL and PTLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QDPL vs PTLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDPL PTLC | -2.91%-2.91% | -2.41%-2.57% | -2.87%-2.99% | +19.00%+8.50% | +70.66%+55.54% | n/a+63.34% |
| Flows | QDPL PTLC | +$24M-$30M | +$97M-$143M | +$68M-$101M | +$485M-$406M | +$1.20B+$190M | -+$184M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDPL PTLC | +10.78%+11.76% | +16.47%+11.30% | +13.39%+12.27% | n/a+11.85% |
| Max drawdown | QDPL PTLC | -4.65%-4.87% | -13.07%-9.00% | -17.47%-15.08% | n/a-15.08% |
| Max drawdown duration | QDPL PTLC | 39d45d | 45d121d | 126d247d | n/a247d |
QDPL | PTLC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.93 | $53.94 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.17 | $54.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QDPL | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QDPL | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.93 | $53.94 |
| 1D performance | -0.58% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $1.42 B | $3.14 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.6% |
QDPL | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index | Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 493 | 479 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2021 | June 11, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QDPL and PTLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, QDPL is down -2.87% year-to-date (YTD), while PTLC has lost -2.99%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDPL or PTLC?
Year-to-date, the QDPL ETF saw +$68M in flows, compared to -$101M for PTLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDPL or PTLC?
Over the past year, QDPL had a volatility of 16.47%, while PTLC experienced 11.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDPL or PTLC?
As of March 13, 2026, QDPL holds $1.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while PTLC manages $3.14 B.
What sectors do the QDPL and PTLC ETFs invest in?
QDPL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Sovereign and Communication Services. Meanwhile, PTLC focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QDPL ETF and PTLC ETF?
QDPL top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. PTLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QDPL or PTLC?
QDPL holds 516 securities with 39.42% of its assets in the top 15. PTLC has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.11%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
