QDPLvsPEPSETF Comparison
ETF 1
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
+0.44%
VS
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belongs to the Alternatives segment. Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QDPL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.29% for PEPS. QDPL is up 11.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$261M in YTD flows. PEPS performs better with 12.46% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDPL and PEPS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QDPL vs PEPS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDPL PEPS | -0.76%+0.06% | +3.46%+4.20% | +11.98%+12.46% | +16.50%+18.76% | +70.14%n/a | +75.84%n/a |
| Flows | QDPL PEPS | +$47M- | +$125M+$2M | +$261M+$2M | +$429M+$2M | +$1.34B- | +$1.49B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDPL PEPS | +10.82%+11.90% | +11.79%+14.02% | +13.58%n/a | +15.40%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QDPL PEPS | -3.11%-3.56% | -8.32%-9.84% | -17.47%n/a | -22.44%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QDPL PEPS | 19d16d | 70d80d | 126dn/a | 704dn/a |
Trading data
QDPL | PEPS | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.04 | $32.87 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $45.77 | $32.53 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PEPS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQDPL | PEPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QDPL | PEPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.04 | $32.87 |
| 1D performance | +0.59% | +1.05% |
| AuM | $1.80 B | $29.57 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.29% |
Characteristics
QDPL | PEPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Morgan Stanley |
| Benchmark | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 505 | 172 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2021 | November 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QDPL
USA
95.95%
Other
4.05%
PEPS
USA
97.13%
Other
2.87%
Sectors
QDPL
Technology
40.67%
Finance
12.61%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.57%
Sovereign
8.26%
Healthcare
8.1%
Industrials
7.12%
Other
14.67%
PEPS
Technology
42.64%
Finance
13.55%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.52%
Healthcare
8.45%
Other
25.84%
Advertisement
Diversification
QDPL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.03%
PEPS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QDPL
NVIDIA Corp.
6.87%
Apple, Inc.
6.41%
Microsoft Corp.
4.88%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.75%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.95%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.38%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.73%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.33%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.32%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.31%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.28%
Tesla, Inc.
1.24%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.10%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30sep2026, USD (BH-2026)
0.88%
PEPS
Apple, Inc.
6.77%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.74%
Morgan Stanley Instl. Liquidity Funds - Government Portfolio
5.19%
Microsoft Corp.
5.12%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.11%
Broadcom Inc.
2.89%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.93%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.86%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.73%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.73%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.71%
Tesla, Inc.
1.37%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.29%
Frequently asked questions about QDPL and PEPS
How have the QDPL and PEPS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, QDPL is up 11.98% year-to-date (YTD), while PEPS has returned 12.46%. That puts PEPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDPL or PEPS?
Year-to-date, the QDPL ETF saw +$261M in flows, compared to +$2M for PEPS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDPL or PEPS?
Over the past year, QDPL had a volatility of 11.79%, while PEPS experienced 14.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDPL or PEPS?
As of September 11, 2026, QDPL holds $1.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while PEPS manages $29.57 M.
What sectors do the QDPL and PEPS ETFs invest in?
QDPL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, PEPS focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the QDPL ETF and PEPS ETF?
QDPL top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. PEPS holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Morgan Stanley Instl. Liquidity Funds - Government Portfolio.
Which ETF is more diversified: QDPL or PEPS?
QDPL holds 508 securities with 40.03% of its assets in the top 15. PEPS has 175 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.11%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QDPL & PEPS
Advertisement
Advertisement
