Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QDPLvsISPYETF Comparison
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belongs to the Alternatives segment. ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (ISPY) is part of the Options Strategies segment. QDPL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Sovereign and Communication Services. In contrast, ISPY's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QDPL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.56% for ISPY. QDPL is down -2.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$68M in YTD flows. ISPY performs better with -2.46% YTD performance, and +$72M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDPL and ISPY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QDPL vs ISPY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDPL ISPY | -2.91%-2.41% | -2.41%-1.96% | -2.87%-2.46% | +19.00%+15.82% | +70.66%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QDPL ISPY | +$24M+$24M | +$97M+$87M | +$68M+$72M | +$485M+$421M | +$1.20B- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDPL ISPY | +10.78%+11.41% | +16.47%+15.53% | +13.39%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QDPL ISPY | -4.65%-4.53% | -13.07%-12.52% | -17.47%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QDPL ISPY | 39d39d | 45d69d | 126dn/a | n/an/a |
QDPL | ISPY | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.93 | $44.04 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.17 | $44.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QDPL | ISPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QDPL | ISPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.93 | $44.04 |
| 1D performance | -0.58% | -0.73% |
| AuM | $1.42 B | $1.18 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.56% |
QDPL | ISPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index | S&P 500 Daily Covered Call index |
| N° of holdings | 493 | 479 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2021 | December 18, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QDPL and ISPY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, QDPL is down -2.87% year-to-date (YTD), while ISPY has lost -2.46%. That puts ISPY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDPL or ISPY?
Year-to-date, the QDPL ETF saw +$68M in flows, compared to +$72M for ISPY.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDPL or ISPY?
Over the past year, QDPL had a volatility of 16.47%, while ISPY experienced 15.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDPL or ISPY?
As of March 13, 2026, QDPL holds $1.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while ISPY manages $1.18 B.
What sectors do the QDPL and ISPY ETFs invest in?
QDPL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Sovereign and Communication Services. Meanwhile, ISPY focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QDPL ETF and ISPY ETF?
QDPL top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ISPY holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QDPL or ISPY?
QDPL holds 516 securities with 39.42% of its assets in the top 15. ISPY has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.29%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
