QDPLvsCSMETF Comparison
ETF 1
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
+0.39%
VS
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and ProShares Large Cap Core Plus ETF (CSM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. QDPL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.45% for CSM. QDPL is up 12.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$308M in YTD flows. CSM performs worse with 10.76% YTD performance, and -$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDPL and CSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QDPL vs CSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDPL CSM | +0.37%+0.39% | +3.79%+2.80% | +12.73%+10.76% | +12.68%+12.29% | +84.64%+93.02% | +73.91%+75.93% |
| Flows | QDPL CSM | +$28M+$75K | +$121M-$4M | +$308M-$15M | +$410M-$37M | +$1.38B-$112M | +$1.52B-$206M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDPL CSM | +10.17%+10.94% | +11.66%+12.51% | +13.49%+15.26% | +15.35%+17.28% |
| Max drawdown | QDPL CSM | -2.82%-3.81% | -8.32%-9.26% | -17.47%-18.18% | -22.44%-23.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | QDPL CSM | 53d72d | 70d98d | 126d124d | 704d713d |
Trading data
QDPL | CSM | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.16 | $87.45 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $45.93 | $86.91 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QDPL | CSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QDPL | CSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.16 | $87.45 |
| 1D performance | +0.50% | +0.62% |
| AuM | $1.85 B | $519.24 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.45% |
Characteristics
QDPL | CSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index | Credit Suisse 130/30 Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2021 | July 13, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QDPL
Data will be available soon
CSM
Data will be available soon
Sectors
QDPL
Data will be available soon
CSM
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
QDPL
Data will be available soon
CSM
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
QDPL
Data will be available soon
CSM
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about QDPL and CSM
How have the QDPL and CSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, QDPL is up 12.73% year-to-date (YTD), while CSM has returned 10.76%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDPL or CSM?
Year-to-date, the QDPL ETF saw +$308M in flows, compared to -$15M for CSM.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDPL or CSM?
Over the past year, QDPL had a volatility of 11.66%, while CSM experienced 12.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDPL or CSM?
As of October 27, 2026, QDPL holds $1.85 B in assets under management (AUM), while CSM manages $519.24 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about QDPL & CSM
Advertisement
Advertisement
