QDPLvsCLSEETF Comparison
ETF 1
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
+0.46%
VS
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. QDPL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 1.52% for CLSE. QDPL is up 12.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$308M in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 22.98% YTD performance, and +$674M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDPL and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QDPL vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDPL CLSE | +0.37%-1.21% | +3.79%-0.26% | +12.73%+22.98% | +12.68%+27.58% | +84.64%+116.59% | +73.91%n/a |
| Flows | QDPL CLSE | +$28M+$62M | +$121M+$240M | +$308M+$674M | +$410M+$705M | +$1.38B+$862M | +$1.52B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDPL CLSE | +10.17%+9.18% | +11.66%+12.99% | +13.49%+13.45% | +15.35%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QDPL CLSE | -2.82%-3.35% | -8.32%-4.60% | -17.47%-15.76% | -22.44%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QDPL CLSE | 53d14d | 70d40d | 126d188d | 704dn/a |
Trading data
QDPL | CLSE | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.16 | $33.60 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $45.93 | $33.56 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CLSE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQDPL | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QDPL | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.16 | $33.60 |
| 1D performance | +0.50% | +0.12% |
| AuM | $1.85 B | $1.03 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 1.52% |
Characteristics
QDPL | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2021 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QDPL
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Sectors
QDPL
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Diversification
QDPL
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
QDPL
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about QDPL and CLSE
How have the QDPL and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, QDPL is up 12.73% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 22.98%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDPL or CLSE?
Year-to-date, the QDPL ETF saw +$308M in flows, compared to +$674M for CLSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDPL or CLSE?
Over the past year, QDPL had a volatility of 11.66%, while CLSE experienced 12.99%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDPL or CLSE?
As of October 27, 2026, QDPL holds $1.85 B in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $1.03 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about QDPL & CLSE
Advertisement
