QDFvsRECSETF Comparison
VS
Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF (QDF) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QDF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. QDF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.15% for RECS. QDF is up 13.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$87M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 10.01% YTD performance, and +$815M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDF and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QDF vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDF RECS | +0.36%-0.31% | +0.01%+2.12% | +13.15%+10.01% | +14.17%+10.70% | +76.77%+89.64% | +71.27%+82.79% |
| Flows | QDF RECS | -$7M+$78M | -$34M+$108M | -$87M+$815M | -$78M+$1.33B | -$233M+$4.62B | -$281M+$4.81B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDF RECS | +9.44%+9.60% | +11.90%+11.76% | +14.11%+14.41% | +15.76%+16.51% |
| Max drawdown | QDF RECS | -3.54%-2.34% | -7.83%-8.79% | -18.14%-18.49% | -22.14%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | QDF RECS | 78d32d | 50d66d | 128d126d | 560d573d |
Trading data
QDF | RECS | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 3:28 PM | $91.28 | $45.16 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $90.47 | $44.93 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QDF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 3:28 PM
Live
Closed
QDF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $91.28 | $45.16 |
| 1D performance | +0.90% | +0.51% |
| AuM | $2.18 B | $6.13 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
QDF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Northern Trust | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 139 | 346 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 14, 2012 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QDF
USA
97.86%
Other
2.14%
RECS
USA
98.88%
Other
1.12%
Sectors
QDF
Technology
43.75%
Finance
16.92%
Industrials
9.01%
Healthcare
8.31%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.08%
Other
14.93%
RECS
Technology
44.95%
Finance
12.49%
Healthcare
8.12%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.44%
Other
27%
Advertisement
Diversification
QDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.15%
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.54%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
QDF
Apple, Inc.
9.57%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.02%
Microsoft Corp.
4.60%
Johnson & Johnson
2.98%
Lam Research Corp.
2.92%
Broadcom Inc.
2.68%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.38%
GE Aerospace
2.30%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.93%
KLA Corp.
1.80%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.76%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.71%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.59%
GE Vernova, Inc.
1.44%
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
12.50%
Apple, Inc.
12.08%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.58%
US81369Y8527
2.65%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.39%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.35%
US92204A8844
1.95%
Bank of America Corp.
1.69%
Chevron Corp.
1.56%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.35%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.25%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.09%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.06%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.03%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.01%
Frequently asked questions about QDF and RECS
How have the QDF and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, QDF is up 13.15% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 10.01%. That puts QDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDF or RECS?
Year-to-date, the QDF ETF saw -$87M in flows, compared to +$815M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDF or RECS?
Over the past year, QDF had a volatility of 11.9%, while RECS experienced 11.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDF or RECS?
As of October 30, 2026, QDF holds $2.18 B in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $6.13 B.
What sectors do the QDF and RECS ETFs invest in?
QDF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QDF ETF and RECS ETF?
QDF top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QDF or RECS?
QDF holds 140 securities with 48.15% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 448 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.54%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QDF & RECS
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
QDF
Advertisement
Advertisement
