QDFvsRECSETF Comparison
VS
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund ETF (QDF) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. QDF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.15% for RECS. QDF is up 14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$53M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 8.19% YTD performance, and +$682M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDF and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QDF vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDF RECS | +1.51%+1.54% | +7.71%+3.51% | +14.00%+8.19% | +23.69%+18.12% | +63.55%+73.65% | +75.91%+86.49% |
| Flows | QDF RECS | -$4M+$9M | -$29M+$186M | -$53M+$682M | -$45M+$1.92B | -$216M+$4.51B | -$233M+$4.68B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDF RECS | +12.25%+11.02% | +12.12%+11.99% | +14.29%+14.59% | +15.81%+16.59% |
| Max drawdown | QDF RECS | -3.59%-3.45% | -7.83%-8.79% | -18.14%-18.49% | -22.14%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | QDF RECS | 10d34d | 50d66d | 128d126d | 560d573d |
Trading data
QDF | RECS | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $93.31 | $44.92 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $91.54 | $44.16 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QDF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QDF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $93.31 | $44.92 |
| 1D performance | +1.93% | +1.72% |
| AuM | $2.24 B | $5.90 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
QDF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 114 | 444 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 14, 2012 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QDF
USA
96.7%
Other
3.3%
RECS
USA
98.76%
Other
1.24%
Sectors
QDF
Technology
41.2%
Finance
19.74%
Industrials
10.47%
Healthcare
9.08%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.41%
Other
12.1%
RECS
Technology
43.15%
Finance
13.39%
Industrials
8.19%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.07%
Healthcare
7.88%
Other
19.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
QDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.77%
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QDF
Apple, Inc.
7.94%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.18%
Broadcom Inc.
3.86%
Lam Research Corp.
3.62%
Microsoft Corp.
3.16%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.99%
Johnson & Johnson
2.85%
GE Aerospace
2.73%
KLA Corp.
2.52%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.40%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.39%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.36%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.93%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.83%
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
11.49%
Apple, Inc.
10.88%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.44%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.82%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.23%
Bank of America Corp.
1.94%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.56%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.33%
Chevron Corp.
1.29%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.21%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.15%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.13%
Lam Research Corp.
1.10%
CVS Health Corp.
1.09%
Starbucks Corp.
1.05%
Frequently asked questions about QDF and RECS
How have the QDF and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, QDF is up 14% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 8.19%. That puts QDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDF or RECS?
Year-to-date, the QDF ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to +$682M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDF or RECS?
Over the past year, QDF had a volatility of 12.12%, while RECS experienced 11.99%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDF or RECS?
As of August 3, 2026, QDF holds $2.24 B in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $5.90 B.
What sectors do the QDF and RECS ETFs invest in?
QDF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QDF ETF and RECS ETF?
QDF top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Broadcom Inc.. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QDF or RECS?
QDF holds 115 securities with 49.77% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 454 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.71%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QDF & RECS
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
QDF
Advertisement
Advertisement
