QDFvsFVALETF Comparison
VS
Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF (QDF) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. QDF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, FVAL's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. QDF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.15% for FVAL. QDF is up 12.36% year-to-date (YTD) with -$71M in YTD flows. FVAL performs better with 13.37% YTD performance, and +$104M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDF and FVAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QDF vs FVAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDF FVAL | -2.84%-1.62% | +0.88%+3.25% | +12.36%+13.37% | +16.75%+20.64% | +65.26%+72.32% | +73.11%+79.24% |
| Flows | QDF FVAL | -$11M+$20M | -$22M+$52M | -$71M+$104M | -$64M+$107M | -$228M+$361M | -$257M+$485M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDF FVAL | +10.26%+10.41% | +12.16%+12.07% | +14.25%+14.31% | +15.83%+16.43% |
| Max drawdown | QDF FVAL | -3.54%-2.71% | -7.83%-8.88% | -18.14%-18.14% | -22.14%-23.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | QDF FVAL | 34d13d | 50d72d | 128d131d | 560d702d |
Trading data
QDF | FVAL | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $90.98 | $82.24 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $90.21 | $81.30 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QDF | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QDF | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $90.98 | $82.24 |
| 1D performance | +0.85% | +1.16% |
| AuM | $2.18 B | $1.36 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
QDF | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Northern Trust | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index | Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 114 | 124 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 14, 2012 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QDF
USA
96.52%
Other
3.48%
FVAL
USA
97.99%
Other
2.01%
Sectors
QDF
Technology
40.69%
Finance
20.5%
Industrials
9.91%
Healthcare
9%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.22%
Other
12.69%
FVAL
Technology
39.97%
Finance
15.9%
Healthcare
10.76%
Industrials
8.83%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.76%
Other
15.78%
Advertisement
Diversification
QDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.14%
FVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QDF
Apple, Inc.
8.59%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.27%
Broadcom Inc.
3.97%
Microsoft Corp.
3.93%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.93%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.91%
Johnson & Johnson
2.79%
GE Aerospace
2.59%
Lam Research Corp.
2.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.38%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.93%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.88%
KLA Corp.
1.63%
FVAL
Apple, Inc.
8.01%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.31%
Microsoft Corp.
4.81%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.75%
Broadcom Inc.
3.35%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.69%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.11%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.87%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.86%
Visa, Inc.
1.46%
Johnson & Johnson
1.42%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.23%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.20%
Bank of America Corp.
1.19%
Frequently asked questions about QDF and FVAL
How have the QDF and FVAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, QDF is up 12.36% year-to-date (YTD), while FVAL has returned 13.37%. That puts FVAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDF or FVAL?
Year-to-date, the QDF ETF saw -$71M in flows, compared to +$104M for FVAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDF or FVAL?
Over the past year, QDF had a volatility of 12.16%, while FVAL experienced 12.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDF or FVAL?
As of September 16, 2026, QDF holds $2.18 B in assets under management (AUM), while FVAL manages $1.36 B.
What sectors do the QDF and FVAL ETFs invest in?
QDF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, FVAL focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QDF ETF and FVAL ETF?
QDF top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Broadcom Inc.. FVAL holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QDF or FVAL?
QDF holds 115 securities with 49.14% of its assets in the top 15. FVAL has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.86%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QDF & FVAL
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
QDF
Advertisement
Advertisement
