Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QDEFvsLSVDETF Comparison
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund ETF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund ETF (QDEF) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QDEF's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, LSVD's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. QDEF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.4% for LSVD. QDEF is up 1.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. LSVD performs worse with 0.77% YTD performance, and +$407K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDEF and LSVD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QDEF vs LSVD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDEF LSVD | -2.47%-2.98% | +0.30%+0.45% | +1.47%+0.77% | +19.90%+27.41% | +72.98%n/a | +83.19%n/a |
| Flows | QDEF LSVD | +$2M+$546K | +$4M+$452K | +$4M+$407K | +$26M+$508M | -$6M- | -$181M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDEF LSVD | +9.48%+12.68% | +14.75%+18.48% | +12.10%n/a | +13.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QDEF LSVD | -2.56%-3.93% | -11.62%-14.20% | -14.47%n/a | -21.30%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QDEF LSVD | 30d29d | 46d45d | 191dn/a | 566dn/a |
QDEF | LSVD | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $82.13 | $30.00 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $82.43 | $29.94 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QDEF | LSVD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QDEF | LSVD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $82.13 | $30.00 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | +0.20% |
| AuM | $502.84 M | $552.46 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.4% |
QDEF | LSVD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | FlexShares | LSV Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 123 | 118 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 14, 2012 | December 18, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QDEF and LSVD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QDEF is up 1.47% year-to-date (YTD), while LSVD has returned 0.77%. That puts QDEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDEF or LSVD?
Year-to-date, the QDEF ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$407K for LSVD.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDEF or LSVD?
Over the past year, QDEF had a volatility of 14.75%, while LSVD experienced 18.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDEF or LSVD?
As of March 11, 2026, QDEF holds $502.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while LSVD manages $552.46 M.
What sectors do the QDEF and LSVD ETFs invest in?
QDEF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, LSVD focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the QDEF ETF and LSVD ETF?
QDEF top holdings include APPLE, NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED. LSVD holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: QDEF or LSVD?
QDEF holds 124 securities with 45.64% of its assets in the top 15. LSVD has 119 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.35%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
