QDEFvsJHMLETF Comparison
VS
Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive ETF (QDEF) and John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QDEF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, JHML's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. QDEF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.32% for JHML. QDEF is up 12.53% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. JHML performs better with 12.75% YTD performance, and -$750K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QDEF and JHML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QDEF vs JHML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDEF JHML | -0.51%-1.80% | +4.98%+1.01% | +12.53%+12.75% | +16.25%+16.09% | +70.53%+69.18% | +82.75%+73.41% |
| Flows | QDEF JHML | -$4M+$7M | -$11M-$11M | +$2M-$750K | +$10M-$55M | +$16M-$66M | -$97M-$24M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QDEF JHML | +8.24%+9.83% | +9.91%+12.10% | +12.04%+14.32% | +13.97%+16.43% |
| Max drawdown | QDEF JHML | -2.46%-3.95% | -6.99%-7.93% | -14.47%-18.02% | -21.30%-23.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | QDEF JHML | 14d36d | 66d63d | 191d127d | 566d708d |
Trading data
QDEF | JHML | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $89.93 | $89.53 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $90.46 | $89.63 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QDEF | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QDEF | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $89.93 | $89.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.59% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $551.76 M | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
QDEF | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Northern Trust | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 133 | 762 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 14, 2012 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QDEF
USA
96.57%
Other
3.43%
JHML
USA
96.66%
Other
3.34%
Sectors
QDEF
Technology
39.07%
Finance
16.13%
Healthcare
10.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.59%
Other
24.86%
JHML
Technology
33.36%
Finance
17.01%
Industrials
11.13%
Healthcare
9.38%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.66%
Other
20.46%
Advertisement
Diversification
QDEF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.38%
JHML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.57%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QDEF
Apple, Inc.
8.26%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.35%
Broadcom Inc.
4.64%
Microsoft Corp.
4.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
3.01%
Johnson & Johnson
2.74%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.33%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.25%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.09%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.96%
KLA Corp.
1.68%
Lam Research Corp.
1.35%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.21%
JHML
Apple, Inc.
4.69%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.99%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.69%
Microsoft Corp.
2.65%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Broadcom Inc.
1.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.67%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.24%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.09%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.90%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.90%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.78%
Johnson & Johnson
0.76%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.72%
Frequently asked questions about QDEF and JHML
How have the QDEF and JHML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, QDEF is up 12.53% year-to-date (YTD), while JHML has returned 12.75%. That puts JHML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QDEF or JHML?
Year-to-date, the QDEF ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$750K for JHML.
Which ETF is more volatile: QDEF or JHML?
Over the past year, QDEF had a volatility of 9.91%, while JHML experienced 12.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: QDEF or JHML?
As of September 17, 2026, QDEF holds $551.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while JHML manages $1.17 B.
What sectors do the QDEF and JHML ETFs invest in?
QDEF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, JHML focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QDEF ETF and JHML ETF?
QDEF top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Broadcom Inc.. JHML holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QDEF or JHML?
QDEF holds 134 securities with 46.38% of its assets in the top 15. JHML has 770 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.57%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QDEF & JHML
Advertisement
